Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Pete and Myra West Elem

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 775 students

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
−17.3 ptsvs 86.3 average · 1,134 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,110 of 1,134tied with 7 others
D69

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 86.3 average for 1,134 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

9.2% −2.3 pts vs 11.5%

  • 9.2% is 2.3 percentage points lower than the 11.5% average among 1,101 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Pete and Myra West Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 86.3 average for 1,134 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2024-25.

Ranks 1,110th of 1,134 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePete and Myra West Elem 7569 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6986.3 1,134 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7586.2 1,110 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,107 reporting
  • School Progress62 D−21.7 vs similar economic context · 1,104 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps61 D−22.8 vs similar economic context · 1,096 reporting
  • Academic Growth62 D−17.5 vs similar economic context · 1,087 reporting
  • Relative Performance56 F−24.0 vs similar economic context · 1,104 reporting
  • Pete and Myra West Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,134 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress62D8
Closing the Gaps61D9
Academic Growth62D8
Relative Performance56F4

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (72), so School Progress (62) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level68%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,107 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,107 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,107 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,106 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,106 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,106 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,103 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,103 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,103 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,018 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,018 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,018 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,134 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
775
Economically disadvantaged
33.7%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
39.9%+29.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.2%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Pete and Myra West Elem

African American: 23.1%Hispanic: 31.6%White: 17.4%American Indian: 1.4%Asian: 20.1%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 6.1%
  • African American 23.1%
  • Hispanic 31.6%
  • White 17.4%
  • American Indian 1.4%
  • Asian 20.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 6.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,134 reporting for every category shown · 1,134 in full cohort

African American: 9%Hispanic: 31.7%White: 47.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 6.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9%
  • Hispanic 31.7%
  • White 47.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 6.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
771
Economically disadvantaged students
260
Emergent bilingual students
308
Special education students
136

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
97
Students in TEA mobility denominator
457
TEA-published mobility rate
21.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 775 students in 2025–26, an increase of 186 (31.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
775

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+186

Increase · +31.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
775
Selected comparison
765.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,113 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Pete and Myra West Elem
School yearStudents enrolledPete and Myra West ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 589 First available year 772.7
2025–26 775 Increase of 186 (31.6%) 765.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
33

4.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
56

8.38 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
668

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.9%
Selected comparison
9.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 867 rated schools reporting

−4.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.38
Selected comparison
20.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 946 rated schools reporting

−12.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Pete and Myra West Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 668 33 4.9% 56 8.38 9.7% 20.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Pete and Myra West Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 33 4.9% 56 8.38 9.7% 20.5
In-school suspensions 30 4.5% 50 7.49 8.7% 15.8
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$9k$25k$41k2025
  • Pete and Myra West Elem
  • Parent district: Aubrey ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,369
Selected comparison
$11,852

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,110 rated schools reporting

−$1,483 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,369 per student for this campus, $39,098 per student for its parent district, Aubrey ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPete and Myra West ElemParent district: Aubrey ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$10,369$39,098$18,972$11,852 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,110 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$58,425−$9,535 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45−5.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.3+2.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Pete and Myra West Elem

Beginning: 27.9%1 to 5 years: 42.7%6 to 10 years: 4.9%11 to 20 years: 9%21 to 30 years: 15.5%
  • Beginning 27.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 42.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 4.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 9%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,134 reporting for every category shown · 1,134 in full cohort

Beginning: 5%1 to 5 years: 22.6%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.9%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 5%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Pete and Myra West Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPete and Myra West Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.418.5
Grade 126.119
Grade 22719.5
Grade 327.620.1
Grade 422.919.7
Grade 527.921.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061907104.