txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Personalized Learning Prep at Jw Ray Lrng Center

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 437 students

Learn more & enroll

C70

Personalized Learning Prep at Jw Ray Lrng Center is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.7 average of the 2,075 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 18 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 83.

Ranks 6,471st of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 76 others), and 995th of 1,157 in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 11 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this school ranks best
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
90807060 Schools like this oneTexas averagePersonalized Learning Prep at Jw Ray Lrng Center 8884829070 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26C7078.781.3
2024-25A9078.381.2
2023-24B8276.278.9
2022-23B8476.779.1
2021-22B8881.883.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Personalized Learning Prep at Jw Ray Lrng Center itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement70 C−4.9 vs similar · −9.5 vs region
  • School Progress72 C−7.9 vs similar · −9.8 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps65 D−11.0 vs similar · −14.4 vs region
  • Academic Growth60 D−12.9 vs similar · −17.1 vs region
  • Relative Performance72 C−6.3 vs similar · −5.8 vs region
  • Personalized Learning Prep at Jw Ray Lrng Center
  • Similar student population (2,075)
  • Region 10: Richardson (1,157)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement70C10
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps65D5
Academic Growth60D10
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (72), so Student Achievement (70) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%−2 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level38%−7 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level15%−3 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level73%−0 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level47%−2 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level21%+2 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level67%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level34%−6 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level12%−3 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level74%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level31%−10 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level9%−9 vs Similar student population

Social Studies

  • Approaches grade level54%−16 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level28%−14 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level10%−8 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (2,075)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (2,075 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
437
Economically disadvantaged
73.7%+0.1 pts vs similar
English learners
38.7%+15.9 pts vs similar
Special education
19.5%+0.7 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.1%+1.4 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
7.7%−11.0 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 22.4%Hispanic: 68.4%White: 3.9%American Indian: 0.7%Asian: 0.7%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 22.4%
  • Hispanic 68.4%
  • White 3.9%
  • American Indian 0.7%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$12k$18k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Personalized Learning Prep at Jw Ray Lrng Center
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$72,042+$5,465 vs similar
Teachers
33
Students per staff member
13.2

Teaching experience

Beginning: 12.1%1 to 5 years: 18.2%6 to 10 years: 36.4%11 to 20 years: 21.2%21 to 30 years: 12.1%
  • Beginning 12.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 36.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.1%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 100 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 1of 562

    Per-student spending

    Dallas County · of the 562 that report this measure · tied with 230

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905160.