+13.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 2,168 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
141 of 2,168tied with 68 others
Score vs region
+5.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
91 of 505tied with 51 others
Score vs county
+5.0 ptsvs 86 average · 127 rated schools in Cameron County
Cameron County placement
21 of 127tied with 9 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,713 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
550 of 4,713tied with 252 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 2,168 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,713 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 42.4% avg · +20.6 pts
Masters
30%vs 16.6% avg · +13.4 pts
Among 2,005 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Pena Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 2,168 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 141st of 2,168 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).
Pena Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 91st of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 51 others).
Pena Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 21st of 127 rated schools in Cameron County (tied with 9 others).
Pena Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,713 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 550th of 4,713 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 252 others).
Pena Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement89 B+16.4 vs similar economic context · 2,005 reporting
School Progress91 A+12.0 vs similar economic context · 1,998 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,984 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,950 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+13.6 vs similar economic context · 1,998 reporting
Pena Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,168 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
89
B
1
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so
Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level84%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting
Meets grade level63%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting
Masters grade level30%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting
Meets grade level68%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting
Masters grade level36%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 reporting
Meets grade level64%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 reporting
Masters grade level26%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level73%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Meets grade level47%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Masters grade level24%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,168 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
503
Economically disadvantaged
79.7%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.8%+6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.3%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.5%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.7%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Pena Elem
Hispanic 98.8%
White 0.6%
Asian 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,168 reporting for every category shown · 2,168 in full cohort
African American 14%
Hispanic 67.3%
White 13.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 96.2%
White 2.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.4%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,713 reporting for every category shown · 4,713 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55%
White 24.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
503
Economically disadvantaged students
401
Emergent bilingual students
175
Special education students
67
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
92
Students in TEA mobility denominator
357
TEA-published mobility rate
25.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 503 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
503
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+2
Increase · +0.4%
Change since 2021–22
+36
Increase · +7.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
503
Selected comparison
630.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,139 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Pena Elem
School year
Students enrolledPena Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
467
First available year
654
2022–23
472
Increase of 5 (1.1%)
657.5
2023–24
471
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
651.7
2024–25
501
Increase of 30 (6.4%)
648.9
2025–26
503
Increase of 2 (0.4%)
630.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
537
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Pena Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
508
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
501
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
503
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
495
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
537
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Pena Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Pena Elem
Parent district: Brownsville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,642
Selected comparison
$13,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,155 rated schools reporting
−$1,407 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,642 per student for this campus, $16,535 per student for its parent district, Brownsville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Pena Elem
Parent district: Brownsville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,065
$11,135
$13,054
$8,117
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,276
$11,998
$13,108
$8,252
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,127
$13,029
$14,058
$8,764
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,074 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,770
$13,534
$14,797
$9,399
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,085 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,244
$15,729
$15,708
$10,832
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,103 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,724
$16,177
$16,792
$11,280
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,123 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,418
$16,871
$18,125
$12,279
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,140 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,642
$16,535
$18,972
$13,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,155 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,795−$1,216 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−10.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5+1.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Pena Elem
Beginning 3.1%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 6.2%
11 to 20 years 44.6%
21 to 30 years 18.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,168 reporting for every category shown · 2,168 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 20.5%
6 to 10 years 14.9%
11 to 20 years 35.1%
21 to 30 years 22.3%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,713 reporting for every category shown · 4,713 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Pena Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPena Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
13.9
18
Grade 1
17.4
18.4
Grade 2
16.8
18.4
Grade 3
13.2
18.9
Grade 4
14.9
19
Grade 5
11.3
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
7 measures
61of 2,003
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,003 that report this measure · tied with 15
74of 1,993
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,993 that report this measure · tied with 9
79of 2,003
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,003 that report this measure · tied with 6
81of 2,003
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,003 that report this measure · tied with 5
91of 2,005
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,005 that report this measure · tied with 9
95of 2,005
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,005 that report this measure · tied with 14
104of 1,993
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,993 that report this measure · tied with 20
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 031901141.