+21.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 2,056among reporting schools
Score vs region
+18.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
Region 17: Lubbock placement
1 of 182among reporting schools
Score vs county
+10.0 ptsvs 90 average · 2 rated schools in Dickens County
Score vs similar-size group
+15.2 ptsvs 84.8 average · 40 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1 of 40among reporting schools
Score vs state
+18.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1 of 7,646tied with 3 others
A100
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is above the 90 average for 2 rated schools in Dickens County.The current score is above the 84.8 average for 40 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 10 points
90 to 1002024-25 to 2025-26
100 is 21.2 points above
the 78.8 average among 2,056 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 2,056 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Patton Springs School is rated A by TEA, scoring 100 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context.
Patton Springs School is rated A by TEA, scoring 100 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.
Patton Springs School is rated A by TEA, scoring 100 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90 average for 2 rated schools in Dickens County. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Patton Springs School is rated A by TEA, scoring 100 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.8 average for 40 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 40 similarly sized rated schools.
Patton Springs School is rated A by TEA, scoring 100 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement89 B+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,920 reporting
School Progress100 A+20.0 vs similar economic context · 1,914 reporting
Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 76 · 1,900 reporting
Academic Growth100 A+27.1 vs similar economic context · 1,856 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,914 reporting
Patton Springs School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,056 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
89
B
1
School Progress
100
A
—
Closing the Gaps
—
Not rated
—
Academic Growth
100
A
—
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (100), so
Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 100.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Meets grade level68%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Masters grade level18%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Meets grade level55%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Masters grade level9%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Meets grade level78%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Masters grade level22%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,056 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
22
Economically disadvantaged
72.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−22.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.7%+3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.4%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Patton Springs School
Hispanic 31.8%
White 68.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting for every category shown · 2,056 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 59.6%
White 22%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 61%
White 30.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Dickens County · 2 reporting for every category shown · 2 in full cohort
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 34%
White 64.6%
Two or More Races 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 40 reporting for every category shown · 40 in full cohort
African American 8%
Hispanic 53.3%
White 34.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.8%
Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
22
Economically disadvantaged students
16
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
5
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
79
TEA-published mobility rate
24.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 22 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 66 (75.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
22
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−66
Decrease · −75.0%
Change since 2021–22
−64
Decrease · −74.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
22
Selected comparison
636.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Patton Springs School
School year
Students enrolledPatton Springs School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
86
First available year
652.9
2022–23
77
Decrease of 9 (10.5%)
658
2023–24
76
Decrease of 1 (1.3%)
656
2024–25
88
Increase of 12 (15.8%)
652.5
2025–26
22
Decrease of 66 (75.0%)
636.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10
10.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
17
18.48 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
92
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
10.9%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 rated schools reporting
−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
18.48
Selected comparison
31.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 rated schools reporting
−13.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Patton Springs School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
103
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
100
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
84
10
11.9%
18
21.43
13.6%
33.3
2023–24
89
Suppressed
—
14
15.73
—
32.9
2024–25
92
10
10.9%
17
18.48
13.3%
31.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Patton Springs School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
10
10.9%
17
18.48
13.3%
31.7
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
12
13.04
—
23.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Patton Springs School
Parent district: Patton Springs ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$20,799
Selected comparison
$13,082
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
+$7,717 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $20,799 per student for this campus, $25,092 per student for its parent district, Patton Springs ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Patton Springs School
Parent district: Patton Springs ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$15,884
$20,268
$13,054
$8,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting
2019
$16,440
$20,384
$13,108
$8,197
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2020
$17,672
$21,084
$14,058
$8,743
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 rated schools reporting
2021
$21,739
$26,468
$14,797
$9,287
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
2022
$24,251
$29,041
$15,708
$10,558
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2023
$27,655
$34,006
$16,792
$11,245
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2024
$27,098
$31,939
$18,125
$12,311
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
2025
$20,799
$25,092
$18,972
$13,082
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,231+$688 vs similar economic context
Teachers
4−39.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
5.2−8.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Patton Springs School
1 to 5 years 59.5%
11 to 20 years 19%
21 to 30 years 21.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting for every category shown · 2,056 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Dickens County · 2 reporting for every category shown · 2 in full cohort
1 to 5 years 45.9%
6 to 10 years 11.9%
11 to 20 years 16.5%
21 to 30 years 25.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 40 reporting for every category shown · 40 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 18.2%
6 to 10 years 9.5%
11 to 20 years 23.5%
21 to 30 years 18.2%
Over 30 years 8.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Patton Springs School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPatton Springs School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
3
17.9
Grade 1
8
18.2
Grade 2
9
18.2
Grade 3
7
18.6
Grade 4
5
18.9
Grade 5
7
19.8
Grade 6
5
17.9
Secondary English
5.4
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
2.9
18
Secondary math
5.3
16.2
Secondary science
7.8
17.5
Secondary social studies
3.7
17.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 67 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
1of 7,646
Overall score
Texas average · of the 7,646 that report this measure · tied with 3 · full ranking
1of 7,238
School Progress
Texas average · of the 7,238 that report this measure · tied with 2 · full ranking
1of 7,090
Academic Growth
Texas average · of the 7,090 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
2of 18
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure
2of 18
Math — Meets
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure
2of 18
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure
3of 31
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 31 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
4of 34
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 34 that report this measure
4of 22
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 32
Attendance
Similar size · of the 32 that report this measure
6of 34
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 34 that report this measure
6of 34
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 32
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 32 that report this measure
6of 31
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 31
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 179
Per-student spending
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 179 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 063906001.