Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Parkway ElemB87vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Parkway Elem
Gregg County · Region 07: Kilgore · 697 students
Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
383 of 2,143tied with 48 others
Score vs region
+7.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
99 of 352tied with 13 others
Score vs county
+3.2 ptsvs 83.8 average · 41 rated schools in Gregg County
Gregg County placement
16 of 41tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,328 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,279 of 4,328tied with 194 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 83.8 average for 41 rated schools in Gregg County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,328 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
57%vs 42.5% avg · +14.5 pts
Masters
28%vs 16.7% avg · +11.3 pts
Among 1,981 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Parkway Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 383rd of 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).
Parkway Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 99th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 13 others).
Parkway Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.8 average for 41 rated schools in Gregg County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 41 rated schools in Gregg County (tied with 3 others).
Parkway Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,328 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,279th of 4,328 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 194 others).
Parkway Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B+9.3 vs similar economic context · 1,981 reporting
School Progress88 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,975 reporting
Closing the Gaps86 B+11.1 vs similar economic context · 1,961 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+12.8 vs similar economic context · 1,925 reporting
Relative Performance88 B+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,975 reporting
Parkway Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,143 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
86
B
4
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
88
B
2
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (88), so
Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level77%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 reporting
Meets grade level57%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 reporting
Masters grade level28%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting
Meets grade level60%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting
Masters grade level27%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level73%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting
Meets grade level55%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting
Masters grade level29%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,143 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
697
Economically disadvantaged
79.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
17.5%−10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.0%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.6%−11.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Parkway Elem
African American 25.6%
Hispanic 37.1%
White 29%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 0.4%
Two or More Races 6.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,143 reporting for every category shown · 2,143 in full cohort
African American 14%
Hispanic 66.7%
White 14.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Gregg County · 41 reporting for every category shown · 41 in full cohort
African American 19.8%
Hispanic 32.3%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,328 reporting for every category shown · 4,328 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
696
Economically disadvantaged students
551
Emergent bilingual students
122
Special education students
146
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
115
Students in TEA mobility denominator
733
TEA-published mobility rate
15.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 697 students in 2025–26, an increase of 23 (3.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
697
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+23
Increase · +3.4%
Change since 2021–22
−31
Decrease · −4.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
697
Selected comparison
635
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,112 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Parkway Elem
School year
Students enrolledParkway Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
728
First available year
657.7
2022–23
678
Decrease of 50 (6.9%)
661.6
2023–24
686
Increase of 8 (1.2%)
656.6
2024–25
674
Decrease of 12 (1.7%)
653.2
2025–26
697
Increase of 23 (3.4%)
635
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
39
5.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
65
8.95 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
726
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.4%
Selected comparison
13.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 rated schools reporting
−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
8.95
Selected comparison
32.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 rated schools reporting
−23.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Parkway Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
813
52
6.4%
106
13.04
8.5%
16.9
2021–22
759
52
6.8%
85
11.20
12.9%
31.2
2022–23
747
66
8.8%
144
19.28
13.8%
34.3
2023–24
760
43
5.7%
98
12.89
13.7%
34.2
2024–25
726
39
5.4%
65
8.95
13.4%
32.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Parkway Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
39
5.4%
65
8.95
13.4%
32.7
In-school suspensions
37
5.1%
56
7.71
11.8%
23.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Parkway Elem
Parent district: Pine Tree ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,118
Selected comparison
$13,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,130 rated schools reporting
−$2,930 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,118 per student for this campus, $19,789 per student for its parent district, Pine Tree ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Parkway Elem
Parent district: Pine Tree ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,198
$10,489
$13,054
$8,105
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,473
$10,978
$13,108
$8,239
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,484
$11,982
$14,058
$8,752
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,379
$12,087
$14,797
$9,387
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,061 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,455
$12,712
$15,708
$10,770
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 rated schools reporting
2023
$13,245
$14,579
$16,792
$11,257
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,098 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,779
$15,724
$18,125
$12,264
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,115 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,118
$19,789
$18,972
$13,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,130 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$59,364−$7,614 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45+1.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5+1.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Parkway Elem
Beginning 2.2%
1 to 5 years 21.8%
6 to 10 years 10.9%
11 to 20 years 48.4%
21 to 30 years 12.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,143 reporting for every category shown · 2,143 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Gregg County · 41 reporting for every category shown · 41 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 16.4%
11 to 20 years 30.1%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,328 reporting for every category shown · 4,328 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Parkway Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classParkway Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 1
18.5
18.4
Grade 2
20.7
18.4
Grade 3
17
18.9
Grade 4
15.5
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 33
Academic Growth
Gregg County · of the 33 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
4of 35
Math — Masters
Gregg County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 35
All Subjects — Masters
Gregg County · of the 35 that report this measure
9of 35
Math — Meets
Gregg County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 38
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Gregg County · of the 38 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
95of 2,058
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,058 that report this measure · tied with 16
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 092904105.