Traditional public school campus
Parks Elem
Bowie County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 777 students
- Current score
- 68/1002025-26
- Score vs similar economic context
- −9.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,309 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,875 of 2,309tied with 42 others
- Score vs region
- −13.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
- 130 of 142tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- −12.7 ptsvs 80.7 average · 42 rated schools in Bowie County
- Bowie County placement
- 36 of 42among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- −12.8 ptsvs 80.8 average · 3,869 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3,430 of 3,869tied with 61 others
- Score vs state
- −13.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,822 of 7,646tied with 96 others
At a glance
The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,309 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is below the 80.7 average for 42 rated schools in Bowie County.The current score is below the 80.8 average for 3,869 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Read the full rating context and placement
Parks Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 68 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,309 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 1,875th of 2,309 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 42 others).
Parks Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 68 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 130th of 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 2 others).
Parks Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 68 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average for 42 rated schools in Bowie County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 36th of 42 rated schools in Bowie County.
Parks Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 68 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.8 average for 3,869 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 3,430th of 3,869 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 61 others).
Parks Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 68 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 6,822nd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 96 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
1 year of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | D | 68 | 77.6 2,309 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Parks Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,309 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 54 | F | 6 |
| School Progress | 69 | D | 1 |
| Closing the Gaps | 67 | D | 3 |
| Academic Growth | 69 | D | 1 |
| Relative Performance | 56 | F | 4 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (69), so Student Achievement (54) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 69.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,309 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 777
- Economically disadvantaged
- 90.6%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 22.4%−17.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 15.4%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Parks Elem
- African American 51.1%
- Hispanic 30.2%
- White 12.1%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,309 reporting for every category shown · 2,309 in full cohort
- African American 14.8%
- Hispanic 75.8%
- White 6.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- African American 16.3%
- Hispanic 21.3%
- White 54.6%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Bowie County · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
- African American 24.2%
- Hispanic 11.4%
- White 55.7%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 0.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 7.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,869 reporting for every category shown · 3,869 in full cohort
- African American 12.4%
- Hispanic 53.6%
- White 24.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 777
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 704
- Emergent bilingual students
- 174
- Special education students
- 120
TEA context labels
- New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $54,995−$13,165 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 55+14.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 14−0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Parks Elem
- Beginning 3.8%
- 1 to 5 years 43.4%
- 6 to 10 years 16.3%
- 11 to 20 years 24.1%
- 21 to 30 years 10.8%
- Over 30 years 1.8%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,309 reporting for every category shown · 2,309 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.8%
- 11 to 20 years 27%
- 21 to 30 years 15%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Bowie County · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 22.2%
- 6 to 10 years 19.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,869 reporting for every category shown · 3,869 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.6%
- 6 to 10 years 20%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 15.1%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 019907118.