Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

P A S S Learning Ctr

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 14 students

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for P A S S Learning Ctr for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for P A S S Learning Ctr for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Enrollment over time
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—77.6 2,054 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.3 2,036 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—73.8 2,018 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—73.3 2,012 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.8 1,987 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.3 · 1,905 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.8 · 1,902 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.9 · 1,891 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.1 · 1,875 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.7 · 1,901 reporting
  • P A S S Learning Ctr
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,054 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
14
Economically disadvantaged
92.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.1%−33.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.4%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
75.7%−17.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
42.9%+19.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

P A S S Learning Ctr

African American: 64.3%Hispanic: 14.3%White: 21.4%
  • African American 64.3%
  • Hispanic 14.3%
  • White 21.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,054 reporting for every category shown · 2,054 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 76.4%White: 5.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 76.4%
  • White 5.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
14
Economically disadvantaged students
13
Emergent bilingual students
1
Special education students
3

TEA context labels

  • Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
14
Students in TEA mobility denominator
14
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 14 students in 2025–26, an increase of 3 (27.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
14

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+3

Increase · +27.3%

Change since 2022–23
−4

Decrease · −22.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
14
Selected comparison
569.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,032 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for P A S S Learning Ctr
School yearStudents enrolledP A S S Learning CtrChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 Not reported Not available —
2022–23 18 No adjacent prior year 611.7
2023–24 15 Decrease of 3 (16.7%) 601.8
2024–25 11 Decrease of 4 (26.7%) 595.2
2025–26 14 Increase of 3 (27.3%) 569.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
15

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for P A S S Learning Ctr
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 Not reported 15 — 15 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 15 — 15 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 15 — 15 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for P A S S Learning Ctr in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 15 — 15 — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements 15 — 15 — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057909007.