Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Opport Awareness Ctr

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 155 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Opport Awareness Ctr for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Opport Awareness Ctr for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—78.0 2,104 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.6 2,094 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—75.2 2,080 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—75.7 2,059 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.7 2,040 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 73.4 · 1,947 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 79.3 · 1,942 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 75.3 · 1,929 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.4 · 1,893 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 77.6 · 1,942 reporting
  • Opport Awareness Ctr
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,104 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 69.4% · 1,947 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 43.2% · 1,947 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 17.1% · 1,947 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 67.2% · 1,937 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 38.9% · 1,937 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 14.6% · 1,937 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,104 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
155
Economically disadvantaged
77.4%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.9%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.5%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
84.0%−9.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
42.6%+22.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Opport Awareness Ctr

African American: 38.1%Hispanic: 43.2%White: 14.2%Asian: 1.9%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 38.1%
  • Hispanic 43.2%
  • White 14.2%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,104 reporting for every category shown · 2,104 in full cohort

African American: 13.7%Hispanic: 64.7%White: 16.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 13.7%
  • Hispanic 64.7%
  • White 16.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
155
Economically disadvantaged students
120
Emergent bilingual students
37
Special education students
41

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
826
Students in TEA mobility denominator
826
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 155 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (8.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
155

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−15

Decrease · −8.8%

Change since 2021–22
−8

Decrease · −4.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
155
Selected comparison
639

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Opport Awareness Ctr
School yearStudents enrolledOpport Awareness CtrChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 163 First available year 657.4
2022–23 166 Increase of 3 (1.8%) 660.5
2023–24 267 Increase of 101 (60.8%) 657.2
2024–25 170 Decrease of 97 (36.3%) 656
2025–26 155 Decrease of 15 (8.8%) 639

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
143

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
217

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Opport Awareness Ctr
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported 91 — 153 — — —
2021–22 Not reported 241 — 718 — — —
2022–23 Not reported 220 — 428 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 258 — 432 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 143 — 217 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Opport Awareness Ctr in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 143 — 217 — — —
In-school suspensions 80 — 97 — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 51 — 66 — — —
DAEP placements 44 — 49 — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements 31 — 34 — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements 14 — 15 — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$58k$109k20182020202220242025
  • Opport Awareness Ctr
  • Parent district: Katy ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$54,783
Selected comparison
$12,995

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 rated schools reporting

+$41,788 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $54,783 per student for this campus, $17,981 per student for its parent district, Katy ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearOpport Awareness CtrParent district: Katy ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$59,497$14,611$13,054$8,060 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting
2019$37,600$14,868$13,108$8,213 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting
2020$33,074$15,576$14,058$8,748 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,010 rated schools reporting
2021$103,637$13,959$14,797$9,338 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 rated schools reporting
2022$34,841$15,755$15,708$10,680 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 rated schools reporting
2023$40,266$17,477$16,792$11,254 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,059 rated schools reporting
2024$32,895$16,789$18,125$12,270 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 rated schools reporting
2025$54,783$17,981$18,972$12,995 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$75,949+$9,186 vs similar economic context
Teachers
74+30.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
2.1−11.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Opport Awareness Ctr

Beginning: 1.9%1 to 5 years: 19.9%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 34.9%21 to 30 years: 22.8%Over 30 years: 0.5%
  • Beginning 1.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 19.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.8%
  • Over 30 years 0.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,104 reporting for every category shown · 2,104 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101914003.