+0.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
811 of 1,691tied with 68 others
Score vs region
+1.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
Region 16: Amarillo placement
109 of 208tied with 2 others
Score vs county
+2.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 62 rated schools in Potter County
Potter County placement
28 of 62tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+2.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 3,802 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,601 of 3,802tied with 123 others
Score vs state
+1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,601 of 7,646tied with 244 others
B83
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 62 rated schools in Potter County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 3,802 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
57%vs 53.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Masters
34%vs 23.3% avg · +10.7 pts
Among 1,633 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Olsen Park Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 811th of 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).
Olsen Park Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 109th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 2 others).
Olsen Park Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 62 rated schools in Potter County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 28th of 62 rated schools in Potter County (tied with 1 other).
Olsen Park Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 3,802 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,601st of 3,802 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 123 others).
Olsen Park Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,633 reporting
School Progress83 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Closing the Gaps77 C−2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,614 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+6.1 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Olsen Park Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
77
C
3
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so
School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level78%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Meets grade level57%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Masters grade level34%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Meets grade level64%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Masters grade level41%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Meets grade level51%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Masters grade level26%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Meets grade level58%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Masters grade level36%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
382
Economically disadvantaged
49.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.6%−10.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.1%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Olsen Park Elem
African American 4.5%
Hispanic 32.4%
White 56.8%
American Indian 0.8%
Asian 1.3%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
African American 9.4%
Hispanic 40.5%
White 42.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Potter County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
African American 9.6%
Hispanic 46.4%
White 35.8%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 4.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,802 reporting for every category shown · 3,802 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 26.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
380
Economically disadvantaged students
188
Emergent bilingual students
10
Special education students
76
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
297
TEA-published mobility rate
6.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 382 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (1.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
382
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−5
Decrease · −1.3%
Change since 2021–22
−42
Decrease · −9.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
382
Selected comparison
647.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Olsen Park Elem
School year
Students enrolledOlsen Park Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
424
First available year
648.7
2022–23
426
Increase of 2 (0.5%)
653.2
2023–24
384
Decrease of 42 (9.9%)
653.1
2024–25
387
Increase of 3 (0.8%)
649.9
2025–26
382
Decrease of 5 (1.3%)
647.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
30
7.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
48
12.40 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
387
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.8%
Selected comparison
12.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,306 rated schools reporting
−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
12.4
Selected comparison
26.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
−14.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Olsen Park Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
426
15
3.5%
36
8.45
9.5%
18.2
2021–22
454
17
3.7%
40
8.81
11.9%
26
2022–23
429
31
7.2%
60
13.99
12.4%
28
2023–24
401
18
4.5%
34
8.48
12.3%
28.3
2024–25
387
30
7.8%
48
12.40
12.0%
26.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Olsen Park Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
30
7.8%
48
12.40
12.0%
26.7
In-school suspensions
29
7.5%
40
10.34
10.8%
20.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Olsen Park Elem
Parent district: Amarillo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,587
Selected comparison
$12,052
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
−$3,465 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,587 per student for this campus, $14,058 per student for its parent district, Amarillo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Olsen Park Elem
Parent district: Amarillo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,501
$10,152
$13,054
$7,847
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,538 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,815
$10,834
$13,108
$8,031
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,557 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,968
$11,942
$14,058
$8,531
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,569 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,529
$13,611
$14,797
$8,929
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,050
$13,291
$15,708
$10,267
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,725
$13,092
$16,792
$10,746
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,096
$13,483
$18,125
$11,553
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,587
$14,058
$18,972
$12,052
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,536−$5,385 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−17.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.3−4.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Olsen Park Elem
Beginning 4%
1 to 5 years 36.3%
6 to 10 years 24.2%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 5.2%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Potter County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 23.3%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,802 reporting for every category shown · 3,802 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Olsen Park Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classOlsen Park Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.7
17.9
Grade 1
22.7
18.3
Grade 2
18
18.5
Grade 3
21
19
Grade 4
20.7
19
Grade 5
22.7
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
7of 59
Reading — Masters
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 59
All Subjects — Masters
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
8of 54
Science — Masters
Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 59
Math — Masters
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 188901120.