+1.0 ptsvs 92 average · 323 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
118 of 323tied with 54 others
Score vs region
+12.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
54 of 839tied with 35 others
Score vs county
+13.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
34 of 466tied with 18 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,482 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
264 of 4,482tied with 119 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 92 average for 323 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,482 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
84%vs 77.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Masters
58%vs 48.6% avg · +9.4 pts
Among 318 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Old Union Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 92 average for 323 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 118th of 323 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).
Old Union Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 54th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 35 others).
Old Union Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 34th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 18 others).
Old Union Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,482 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 264th of 4,482 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 119 others).
Old Union Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+2.0 vs similar economic context · 318 reporting
School Progress83 B−5.4 vs similar economic context · 316 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B−1.9 vs similar economic context · 314 reporting
Academic Growth79 C−8.2 vs similar economic context · 314 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 316 reporting
Old Union Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (323 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
79
C
1
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so
School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 reporting
Meets grade level84%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 reporting
Masters grade level58%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 reporting
Meets grade level90%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 reporting
Masters grade level66%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 reporting
Meets grade level77%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 reporting
Masters grade level50%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (323 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
455
Economically disadvantaged
2.9%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.8%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Old Union Elem
African American 1.1%
Hispanic 13.2%
White 57.4%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 19.3%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 8.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 reporting for every category shown · 323 in full cohort
African American 4.4%
Hispanic 15.5%
White 48%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 25.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,482 reporting for every category shown · 4,482 in full cohort
African American 11.9%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
455
Economically disadvantaged students
13
Emergent bilingual students
47
Special education students
67
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
11
Students in TEA mobility denominator
320
TEA-published mobility rate
3.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 455 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 3 (0.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
455
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−3
Decrease · −0.7%
Change since 2021–22
−20
Decrease · −4.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
455
Selected comparison
843.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Old Union Elem
School year
Students enrolledOld Union Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
475
First available year
860.4
2022–23
472
Decrease of 3 (0.6%)
879.4
2023–24
456
Decrease of 16 (3.4%)
861.7
2024–25
458
Increase of 2 (0.4%)
854.5
2025–26
455
Decrease of 3 (0.7%)
843.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
477
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Old Union Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
482
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
496
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
478
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
463
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
477
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Old Union Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Old Union Elem
Parent district: Carroll ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,349
Selected comparison
$10,589
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 314 rated schools reporting
−$240 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,349 per student for this campus, $17,762 per student for its parent district, Carroll ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Old Union Elem
Parent district: Carroll ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,619
$16,700
$13,054
$7,079
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 262 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,707
$20,818
$13,108
$7,266
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 270 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,157
$19,862
$14,058
$7,566
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 278 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,086
$17,912
$14,797
$7,985
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,238
$14,946
$15,708
$9,232
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,691
$15,707
$16,792
$9,156
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,829
$17,368
$18,125
$9,989
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 307 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,349
$17,762
$18,972
$10,589
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 314 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,972+$1,323 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−18.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.5−2.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Old Union Elem
1 to 5 years 11%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 35.6%
21 to 30 years 27.9%
Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 reporting for every category shown · 323 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 31.4%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,482 reporting for every category shown · 4,482 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.1%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Old Union Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classOld Union Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17
19
Grade 1
18
19.3
Grade 2
17.3
19.7
Grade 3
19.7
21.7
Grade 4
21.9
20.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
10of 812
Reading — Masters
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 812 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 456
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
9 measures
12of 456
Reading — Approaches
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 2
13of 457
All Subjects — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 2
13of 456
Reading — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 1
16of 457
All Subjects — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 2
18of 457
Attendance
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 6
18of 455
Math — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 1
24of 813
Student Achievement
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 16
42of 810
Math — Meets
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 3
190of 4,250
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,250 that report this measure · tied with 43
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220919107.