+4.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 1,955 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
707 of 1,955tied with 86 others
Score vs region
−1.3 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
742 of 1,303tied with 55 others
Score vs county
−1.4 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
519 of 911tied with 38 others
Score vs similar-size group
+1.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,532 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,179 of 2,532tied with 90 others
Score vs state
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 1,955 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is below the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 2,532 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
47%vs 40.5% avg · +6.5 pts
Masters
18%vs 16.1% avg · +1.9 pts
Among 1,811 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Odom Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 1,955 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 707th of 1,955 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 86 others).
Odom Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 742nd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 55 others).
Odom Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 519th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 38 others).
Odom Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 2,532 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,179th of 2,532 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 90 others).
Odom Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement73 C+2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,811 reporting
School Progress82 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,808 reporting
Closing the Gaps83 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,798 reporting
Academic Growth78 C+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,784 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,807 reporting
Odom Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,955 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
73
C
7
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
83
B
7
Academic Growth
78
C
2
Relative Performance
82
B
8
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so
Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level71%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,811 reporting
Meets grade level47%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,811 reporting
Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,811 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,811 reporting
Meets grade level51%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,811 reporting
Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,811 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level68%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 reporting
Meets grade level50%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level61%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
Meets grade level33%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
Masters grade level8%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,955 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
288
Economically disadvantaged
93.8%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
74.3%+32.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.1%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.6%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.4%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Odom Elem
African American 1.7%
Hispanic 95.8%
White 1.4%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting for every category shown · 1,955 in full cohort
African American 15%
Hispanic 76.8%
White 5.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,532 reporting for every category shown · 2,532 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 52.2%
White 31.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
288
Economically disadvantaged students
270
Emergent bilingual students
214
Special education students
55
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
62
Students in TEA mobility denominator
361
TEA-published mobility rate
17.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 288 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 34 (10.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
288
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−34
Decrease · −10.6%
Change since 2021–22
−111
Decrease · −27.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
288
Selected comparison
565.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Odom Elem
School year
Students enrolledOdom Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
399
First available year
611.8
2022–23
374
Decrease of 25 (6.3%)
608.1
2023–24
342
Decrease of 32 (8.6%)
598.1
2024–25
322
Decrease of 20 (5.8%)
591.2
2025–26
288
Decrease of 34 (10.6%)
565.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15
4.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
34
9.74 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
349
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.3%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,163 rated schools reporting
−8.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
9.74
Selected comparison
30.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,256 rated schools reporting
−20.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Odom Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
442
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
432
Suppressed
—
13
3.01
—
29.3
2022–23
402
13
3.2%
18
4.48
13.4%
32.4
2023–24
398
19
4.8%
29
7.29
13.6%
32.6
2024–25
349
15
4.3%
34
9.74
13.0%
30.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Odom Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
15
4.3%
34
9.74
13.0%
30.6
In-school suspensions
12
3.4%
21
6.02
11.2%
21.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
13
3.72
—
15.6
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Odom Elem
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,989
Selected comparison
$13,229
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 rated schools reporting
+$1,760 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,989 per student for this campus, $17,481 per student for its parent district, Aldine ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Odom Elem
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,113
$16,847
$13,054
$8,342
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,124
$11,964
$13,108
$8,357
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2020
$10,123
$11,579
$14,058
$8,856
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,305
$13,398
$14,797
$9,693
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,213
$13,566
$15,708
$11,259
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 rated schools reporting
2023
$12,219
$15,592
$16,792
$11,815
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,500
$17,695
$18,125
$12,684
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,989
$17,481
$18,972
$13,229
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,616+$3,205 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−16.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.1−2.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Odom Elem
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 38%
6 to 10 years 11.4%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 8.4%
Over 30 years 8.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting for every category shown · 1,955 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,532 reporting for every category shown · 2,532 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Odom Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classOdom Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 1
13.2
18.3
Grade 2
14.2
18.3
Grade 3
13.5
18.5
Grade 4
19.9
18.4
Grade 5
25.3
19.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101902115.