−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 1,814 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,010 of 1,814tied with 72 others
Score vs region
+1.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
291 of 650tied with 28 others
Score vs county
+2.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 401 rated schools in Bexar County
Bexar County placement
164 of 401tied with 15 others
Score vs similar-size group
−0.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 3,466 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,856 of 3,466tied with 136 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.3 average for 1,814 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County.The current score is level with the 80.4 average for 3,466 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
57%vs 51.4% avg · +5.6 pts
Masters
28%vs 21.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Among 1,746 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Northwood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 1,814 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,010th of 1,814 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 72 others).
Northwood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 291st of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 28 others).
Northwood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 164th of 401 rated schools in Bexar County (tied with 15 others).
Northwood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.4 average for 3,466 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,856th of 3,466 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 136 others).
Northwood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement80 B−0.6 vs similar economic context · 1,746 reporting
School Progress82 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,724 reporting
Academic Growth71 C−4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,697 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
Northwood Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,814 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
80
B
10
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
71
C
9
Relative Performance
82
B
8
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so
Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level75%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Meets grade level57%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Masters grade level28%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Meets grade level66%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Masters grade level34%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 reporting
Meets grade level54%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 reporting
Masters grade level25%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level53%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 reporting
Meets grade level35%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 reporting
Masters grade level18%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,814 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
353
Economically disadvantaged
54.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.5%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.8%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.7%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
21.8%+6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Northwood Elem
African American 6.6%
Hispanic 54.5%
White 32.9%
Two or More Races 6.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,814 reporting for every category shown · 1,814 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 43.9%
White 39%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
African American 7%
Hispanic 75.9%
White 11.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,466 reporting for every category shown · 3,466 in full cohort
African American 11.2%
Hispanic 54.2%
White 28.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
347
Economically disadvantaged students
189
Emergent bilingual students
33
Special education students
86
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
63
Students in TEA mobility denominator
288
TEA-published mobility rate
21.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 353 students in 2025–26, an increase of 50 (16.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
353
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+50
Increase · +16.5%
Change since 2021–22
−19
Decrease · −5.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
353
Selected comparison
636.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,775 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Northwood Elem
School year
Students enrolledNorthwood Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
372
First available year
639.3
2022–23
344
Decrease of 28 (7.5%)
645.4
2023–24
330
Decrease of 14 (4.1%)
645.4
2024–25
303
Decrease of 27 (8.2%)
642
2025–26
353
Increase of 50 (16.5%)
636.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
5.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
49
14.58 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
336
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.4%
Selected comparison
12.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,400 rated schools reporting
−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
14.58
Selected comparison
28.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,507 rated schools reporting
−13.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Northwood Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
452
Suppressed
—
21
4.65
—
19
2021–22
406
23
5.7%
42
10.34
12.4%
28
2022–23
388
31
8.0%
62
15.98
12.9%
29.6
2023–24
350
24
6.9%
61
17.43
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
336
18
5.4%
49
14.58
12.5%
28.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Northwood Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
5.4%
49
14.58
12.5%
28.1
In-school suspensions
14
4.2%
27
8.04
11.2%
21.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
19
5.65
—
9
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Northwood Elem
Parent district: North East ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,131
Selected comparison
$12,174
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 rated schools reporting
+$957 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,131 per student for this campus, $14,654 per student for its parent district, North East ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Northwood Elem
Parent district: North East ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,864
$13,083
$13,054
$7,899
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,443
$14,039
$13,108
$8,066
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,353
$13,031
$14,058
$8,632
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,662
$12,752
$14,797
$9,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,820
$13,646
$15,708
$10,376
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 rated schools reporting
2023
$12,997
$13,795
$16,792
$10,883
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,302
$16,269
$18,125
$11,729
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,760 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,131
$14,654
$18,972
$12,174
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,966−$1,613 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−13.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.2−7.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Northwood Elem
Beginning 3.5%
1 to 5 years 22.8%
6 to 10 years 21.1%
11 to 20 years 35.1%
21 to 30 years 17.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,814 reporting for every category shown · 1,814 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,466 reporting for every category shown · 3,466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.3%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Northwood Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classNorthwood Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21
18
Grade 1
16
18.3
Grade 2
16
18.5
Grade 3
20
18.8
Grade 4
20.8
19
Grade 5
15.9
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015910109.