−2.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,009 of 1,674tied with 67 others
Score vs region
−0.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
426 of 839tied with 37 others
Score vs county
±0.0 ptsvs 80 average · 179 rated schools in Denton County
Denton County placement
81 of 179tied with 8 others
Score vs similar-size group
−0.8 ptsvs 80.8 average · 3,965 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,193 of 3,965tied with 119 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is level with the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County.The current score is below the 80.8 average for 3,965 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 53.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
28%vs 23.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Among 1,617 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Nette Shultz is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,009th of 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Nette Shultz is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 426th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 37 others).
Nette Shultz is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 81st of 179 rated schools in Denton County (tied with 8 others).
Nette Shultz is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.8 average for 3,965 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,193rd of 3,965 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 119 others).
Nette Shultz is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B±0.0 vs similar economic context · 1,617 reporting
School Progress81 B−0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,612 reporting
Closing the Gaps75 C−4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
Academic Growth76 C+0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,584 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 1,612 reporting
Nette Shultz
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,674 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
75
C
5
Academic Growth
76
C
4
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (82), so
School Progress (81) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level78%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 reporting
Meets grade level55%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 reporting
Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 reporting
Meets grade level65%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 reporting
Masters grade level35%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,609 reporting
Meets grade level53%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,609 reporting
Masters grade level27%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,609 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level64%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting
Meets grade level30%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting
Masters grade level15%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,674 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
762
Economically disadvantaged
49.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.8%+5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.6%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.4%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Nette Shultz
African American 7.9%
Hispanic 40.7%
White 42.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.4%
Two or More Races 8.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort
African American 9.4%
Hispanic 40.2%
White 42.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 33.2%
White 36.5%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 10.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,965 reporting for every category shown · 3,965 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.7%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
756
Economically disadvantaged students
372
Emergent bilingual students
142
Special education students
156
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
74
Students in TEA mobility denominator
630
TEA-published mobility rate
11.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 762 students in 2025–26, an increase of 14 (1.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
762
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+14
Increase · +1.9%
Change since 2021–22
+118
Increase · +18.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
762
Selected comparison
650.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Nette Shultz
School year
Students enrolledNette Shultz
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
644
First available year
651.2
2022–23
690
Increase of 46 (7.1%)
655.9
2023–24
704
Increase of 14 (2.0%)
655.7
2024–25
748
Increase of 44 (6.3%)
652.3
2025–26
762
Increase of 14 (1.9%)
650.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11
1.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
18
2.30 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
783
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.4%
Selected comparison
11.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,293 rated schools reporting
−10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.3
Selected comparison
26.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,390 rated schools reporting
−24.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Nette Shultz
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
585
24
4.1%
51
8.72
9.5%
18.1
2021–22
687
10
1.5%
31
4.51
11.8%
25.8
2022–23
721
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
736
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
783
11
1.4%
18
2.30
11.9%
26.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Nette Shultz in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
11
1.4%
18
2.30
11.9%
26.5
In-school suspensions
10
1.3%
16
2.04
10.7%
20.3
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Nette Shultz
Parent district: Denton ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,520
Selected comparison
$12,001
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting
−$2,481 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,520 per student for this campus, $26,904 per student for its parent district, Denton ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Nette Shultz
Parent district: Denton ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,612
$14,175
$13,054
$7,852
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,351
$14,042
$13,108
$8,037
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,540 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,985
$19,314
$14,058
$8,530
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,552 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,626
$22,233
$14,797
$8,927
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,570 rated schools reporting
2022
$15,366
$21,473
$15,708
$10,250
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,336
$22,155
$16,792
$10,711
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,531
$23,301
$18,125
$11,542
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,520
$26,904
$18,972
$12,001
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,386−$2,595 vs similar economic context
Teachers
51+8.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8−5.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Nette Shultz
1 to 5 years 9.8%
6 to 10 years 33.3%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 25.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.6%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
Beginning 4.6%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,965 reporting for every category shown · 3,965 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Nette Shultz in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classNette Shultz · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.6
18
Grade 1
17.4
18.4
Grade 2
17.4
18.5
Grade 3
19.7
19
Grade 4
20.8
19
Grade 5
17.7
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061901109.