+4.3 ptsvs 91.7 average · 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
15 of 386tied with 20 others
Score vs region
+13.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
27 of 1,157tied with 12 others
Score vs county
+9.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
5 of 307tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.0 ptsvs 82 average · 2,390 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
24 of 2,390tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+14.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
146 of 7,646tied with 100 others
A96
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.7 average for 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 82 average for 2,390 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
90%vs 76.6% avg · +13.4 pts
Masters
69%vs 47.6% avg · +21.4 pts
Among 379 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Nelson MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.7 average for 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 20 others).
Nelson MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 12 others).
Nelson MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 4 others).
Nelson MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82 average for 2,390 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 2,390 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Nelson MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+4.2 vs similar economic context · 379 reporting
School Progress95 A+6.9 vs similar economic context · 377 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+5.5 vs similar economic context · 374 reporting
Academic Growth95 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 374 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+12.1 vs similar economic context · 377 reporting
Nelson MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (386 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
95
A
—
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (97), so
School Progress (95) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level98%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 reporting
Meets grade level90%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 reporting
Masters grade level69%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 reporting
Meets grade level93%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 reporting
Masters grade level76%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 reporting
Meets grade level91%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 reporting
Masters grade level65%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 reporting
Meets grade level92%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 reporting
Masters grade level71%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 121 reporting
Meets grade level77%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 121 reporting
Masters grade level52%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 121 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (386 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,044
Economically disadvantaged
4.8%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.4%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.7%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.7%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.6%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Nelson MS
African American 4.6%
Hispanic 3.8%
White 13.5%
American Indian 1.5%
Asian 73.6%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 reporting for every category shown · 386 in full cohort
African American 4.6%
Hispanic 16.6%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 24.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,390 reporting for every category shown · 2,390 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 51.5%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,044
Economically disadvantaged students
50
Emergent bilingual students
25
Special education students
101
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
15
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,097
TEA-published mobility rate
1.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,044 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 50 (4.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,044
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−50
Decrease · −4.6%
Change since 2021–22
−82
Decrease · −7.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,044
Selected comparison
857.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Nelson MS
School year
Students enrolledNelson MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,126
First available year
870.6
2022–23
1,130
Increase of 4 (0.4%)
892.3
2023–24
1,131
Increase of 1 (0.1%)
881
2024–25
1,094
Decrease of 37 (3.3%)
872
2025–26
1,044
Decrease of 50 (4.6%)
857.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
35
3.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
49
4.47 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,097
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.2%
Selected comparison
4.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 208 rated schools reporting
−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.47
Selected comparison
7.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated schools reporting
−2.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Nelson MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,043
18
1.7%
42
4.03
3.2%
4.8
2021–22
1,145
17
1.5%
34
2.97
4.5%
7.4
2022–23
1,136
41
3.6%
68
5.99
4.6%
7.3
2023–24
1,131
50
4.4%
76
6.72
4.5%
7.5
2024–25
1,097
35
3.2%
49
4.47
4.5%
7.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Nelson MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
35
3.2%
49
4.47
4.5%
7.3
In-school suspensions
32
2.9%
36
3.28
4.2%
5.9
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
12
1.09
—
2.4
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Nelson MS
Parent district: Frisco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,809
Selected comparison
$10,972
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
−$3,163 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,809 per student for this campus, $15,444 per student for its parent district, Frisco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Nelson MS
Parent district: Frisco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,682
$11,596
$13,054
$7,204
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,831
$11,635
$13,108
$7,357
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 326 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,476
$13,490
$14,058
$7,663
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 335 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,198
$14,862
$14,797
$8,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 344 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,835
$14,644
$15,708
$9,583
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,523
$15,227
$16,792
$9,489
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 356 rated schools reporting
2024
$6,728
$14,358
$18,125
$10,287
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,809
$15,444
$18,972
$10,972
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$69,721+$184 vs similar economic context
Teachers
66+10.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9+1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Nelson MS
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 39.5%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 23.7%
21 to 30 years 6.1%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 reporting for every category shown · 386 in full cohort
Beginning 4.1%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 31.6%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,390 reporting for every category shown · 2,390 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Nelson MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classNelson MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
23.5
18.6
Secondary English
21.3
19
Secondary languages other than English
23.5
21.7
Secondary math
21.5
18.8
Secondary science
23.3
21.5
Secondary social studies
26.8
21.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
8 measures
2of 293
Student Achievement
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 293
Reading — Approaches
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 4
2of 293
Reading — Masters
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure
2of 292
Math — Meets
Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure
3of 293
All Subjects — Approaches
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 293
Reading — Meets
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 292
Math — Approaches
Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 285
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Collin County · of the 285 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
4of 293
All Subjects — Masters
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure
4of 289
Academic Growth
Collin County · of the 289 that report this measure · tied with 5
4of 275
Science — Approaches
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure · tied with 5
5of 307
Overall score
Collin County · of the 307 that report this measure · tied with 4
5of 293
All Subjects — Meets
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 285
Attendance
Collin County · of the 285 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 292
Math — Masters
Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 275
Science — Meets
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure · tied with 3
10of 275
Science — Masters
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure · tied with 3
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
30of 2,357
School Progress
Similar size · of the 2,357 that report this measure · tied with 21
36of 1,102
Closing the Gaps
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,102 that report this measure · tied with 12
46of 1,123
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 1,123 that report this measure · tied with 7
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043905057.