Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Navarro Elem

Caldwell County · Region 13: Austin · 530 students

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−10 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−9.7 ptsvs 78.7 average · 2,072 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,665 of 2,072tied with 100 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.7 average for 2,072 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Navarro Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.7 average for 2,072 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,665th of 2,072 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 100 others).

2 consecutive years rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Special Education

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
30.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,072 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,072 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageNavarro Elem 7968676369 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6978.7 2,072 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6378.4 2,055 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6776.3 2,042 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6876.8 2,017 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7981.8 2,001 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement62 D−13.0 vs similar economic context · 1,938 reporting
  • School Progress69 D−10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,932 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps68 D−8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
  • Academic Growth69 D−3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,873 reporting
  • Relative Performance62 D−16.3 vs similar economic context · 1,932 reporting
  • Navarro Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,072 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement62D8
School Progress69D1
Closing the Gaps68D2
Academic Growth69D1
Relative Performance62D8

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (69), so Student Achievement (62) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 69.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level58%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,927 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,927 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,927 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level30%−41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 reporting
  • Meets grade level9%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 reporting
  • Masters grade level1%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,072 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
530
Economically disadvantaged
73.2%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
47.9%+25.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.6%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.1%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.5%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Navarro Elem

African American: 1.5%Hispanic: 80%White: 16.6%American Indian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 1.5%
  • Hispanic 80%
  • White 16.6%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,072 reporting for every category shown · 2,072 in full cohort

African American: 12.7%Hispanic: 60.2%White: 21.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.7%
  • Hispanic 60.2%
  • White 21.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
530
Economically disadvantaged students
388
Emergent bilingual students
254
Special education students
72

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
101
Students in TEA mobility denominator
623
TEA-published mobility rate
16.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 530 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 137 (20.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
530

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−137

Decrease · −20.5%

Change since 2021–22
+1

Increase · +0.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
530
Selected comparison
636.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Navarro Elem
School yearStudents enrolledNavarro ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 529 First available year 653.2
2022–23 580 Increase of 51 (9.6%) 657.8
2023–24 603 Increase of 23 (4.0%) 656
2024–25 667 Increase of 64 (10.6%) 652.7
2025–26 530 Decrease of 137 (20.5%) 636.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
719

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Navarro Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 558 26 4.7% 32 5.73 9.3% 18.5
2021–22 600 22 3.7% 30 5.00 13.0% 31
2022–23 639 10 1.6% 12 1.88 13.6% 33.3
2023–24 676 30 4.4% 37 5.47 13.5% 33
2024–25 719 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Navarro Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$23k20182020202220242025
  • Navarro Elem
  • Parent district: Lockhart ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,041
Selected comparison
$13,197

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,054 rated schools reporting

−$5,156 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,041 per student for this campus, $19,438 per student for its parent district, Lockhart ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearNavarro ElemParent district: Lockhart ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,701$11,543$13,054$8,054 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting
2019$6,708$10,549$13,108$8,201 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting
2020$7,180$10,524$14,058$8,751 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting
2021$7,169$21,554$14,797$9,301 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2022$8,504$12,435$15,708$10,594 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2023$8,406$12,906$16,792$11,232 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting
2024$8,993$16,007$18,125$12,377 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 rated schools reporting
2025$8,041$19,438$18,972$13,197 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,054 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,027−$5,563 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−12.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.1+3.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Navarro Elem

Beginning: 9.7%1 to 5 years: 45.2%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 15.5%21 to 30 years: 9.7%
  • Beginning 9.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,072 reporting for every category shown · 2,072 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.6%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.3%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Navarro Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classNavarro Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2217.9
Grade 12418.2
Grade 222.818.3
Grade 324.418.6
Grade 419.618.9
Grade 52819.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 6of 14

    Reading — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 14

    Math — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Attendance

    Caldwell County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Caldwell County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 14

    All Subjects — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 14

    Math — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    Academic Growth

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 14

    Relative Performance

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 14

    All Subjects — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 14

    Reading — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    Math — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 028902103.