Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Nancy Neal Elem

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 440 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
268 of 1,415tied with 83 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 57.5% avg · +17.5 pts
Masters
42%vs 26.3% avg · +15.7 pts

Among 1,373 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 51.1% avg · +23.9 pts
Masters
49%vs 21.8% avg · +27.2 pts

Among 1,367 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 62.4% avg · +12.6 pts
Masters
36%vs 27.9% avg · +8.1 pts

Among 1,372 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Nancy Neal Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 268th of 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 83 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageNancy Neal Elem 9291929391 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9183.9 1,415 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9384.2 1,384 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9282.5 1,363 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9183.0 1,347 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9285.0 1,326 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,373 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps88 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,359 reporting
  • Academic Growth88 B+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,345 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
  • Nancy Neal Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps88B2
Academic Growth88B2
Relative Performance91A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level89%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
440
Economically disadvantaged
41.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.2%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.5%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Nancy Neal Elem

African American: 22.6%Hispanic: 28.8%White: 33.6%Asian: 5.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 8.9%
  • African American 22.6%
  • Hispanic 28.8%
  • White 33.6%
  • Asian 5.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 8.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.1%White: 45.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.1%
  • White 45.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
438
Economically disadvantaged students
180
Emergent bilingual students
62
Special education students
87

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
323
TEA-published mobility rate
5.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 440 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (3.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
440

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+13

Increase · +3.0%

Change since 2021–22
+30

Increase · +7.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
440
Selected comparison
702.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,383 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Nancy Neal Elem
School yearStudents enrolledNancy Neal ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 410 First available year 701.2
2022–23 416 Increase of 6 (1.5%) 708.2
2023–24 423 Increase of 7 (1.7%) 709.3
2024–25 427 Increase of 4 (0.9%) 706.3
2025–26 440 Increase of 13 (3.0%) 702.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14

3.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
24

5.42 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
443

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.2%
Selected comparison
10.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,094 rated schools reporting

−7.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
5.42
Selected comparison
23.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 rated schools reporting

−18.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Nancy Neal Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 444 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 437 Suppressed — 15 3.43 — 23.4
2022–23 440 Suppressed — 13 2.95 — 24.8
2023–24 445 12 2.7% 23 5.17 11.2% 25.1
2024–25 443 14 3.2% 24 5.42 10.8% 23.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Nancy Neal Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 14 3.2% 24 5.42 10.8% 23.5
In-school suspensions 10 2.3% 19 4.29 9.7% 18.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Nancy Neal Elem
  • Parent district: Mansfield ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,758
Selected comparison
$11,957

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,385 rated schools reporting

−$1,199 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,758 per student for this campus, $16,334 per student for its parent district, Mansfield ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearNancy Neal ElemParent district: Mansfield ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,912$11,552$13,054$7,807 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,266 rated schools reporting
2019$7,618$13,103$13,108$8,014 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,285 rated schools reporting
2020$8,143$14,760$14,058$8,386 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,294 rated schools reporting
2021$8,750$13,518$14,797$8,788 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,312 rated schools reporting
2022$9,684$12,626$15,708$10,115 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,327 rated schools reporting
2023$9,662$13,556$16,792$10,598 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,347 rated schools reporting
2024$10,351$14,418$18,125$11,695 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,364 rated schools reporting
2025$10,758$16,334$18,972$11,957 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,385 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,236+$6,888 vs similar economic context
Teachers
35−11.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.5−1.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Nancy Neal Elem

Beginning: 5.7%1 to 5 years: 14.3%6 to 10 years: 22.9%11 to 20 years: 34.4%21 to 30 years: 18.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 18.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.5%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.7%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Nancy Neal Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classNancy Neal Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten18.218
Grade 120.618.6
Grade 220.118.8
Grade 321.219.5
Grade 419.119.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

3 measures

  • 20of 455

    Math — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure

  • 35of 810

    Relative Performance

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 14

  • 63of 1,367

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,367 that report this measure · tied with 7

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220908126.