+1.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
937 of 2,073tied with 103 others
Score vs region
+2.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland
Region 18: Midland placement
65 of 157tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+0.5 ptsvs 79.5 average · 11 rated schools in Howard County
Howard County placement
6 of 11tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
−0.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,626 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,922 of 3,626tied with 143 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.5 average for 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland.The current score is above the 79.5 average for 11 rated schools in Howard County.The current score is level with the 80.3 average for 3,626 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0%−18.9 pts vs 18.9%
0% is 18.9 percentage points lower than
the 18.9% average among 2,000 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st-lowest of 2,000 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 5 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Moss Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 937th of 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 103 others).
Moss Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 65th of 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland (tied with 3 others).
Moss Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.5 average for 11 rated schools in Howard County. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 11 rated schools in Howard County (tied with 2 others).
Moss Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.3 average for 3,626 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,922nd of 3,626 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 143 others).
Moss Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,073 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
—
Not rated
—
School Progress
—
Not rated
—
Closing the Gaps
—
Not rated
—
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
—
Not rated
—
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
366
Economically disadvantaged
74.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.1%−10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.9%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.6%+3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−18.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Moss Elem
African American 4.9%
Hispanic 70.8%
White 19.4%
Two or More Races 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 reporting for every category shown · 2,073 in full cohort
African American 13%
Hispanic 61.5%
White 20%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
African American 3.4%
Hispanic 72.1%
White 20.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Howard County · 11 reporting for every category shown · 11 in full cohort
African American 3%
Hispanic 58%
White 35.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,626 reporting for every category shown · 3,626 in full cohort
African American 11.4%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 27.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
366
Economically disadvantaged students
273
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
69
TEA context labels
Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 366 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
366
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−14
Decrease · −3.7%
Change since 2021–22
−107
Decrease · −22.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
366
Selected comparison
638.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,044 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Moss Elem
School year
Students enrolledMoss Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
473
First available year
655.6
2022–23
461
Decrease of 12 (2.5%)
659.6
2023–24
427
Decrease of 34 (7.4%)
656.8
2024–25
380
Decrease of 47 (11.0%)
654.4
2025–26
366
Decrease of 14 (3.7%)
638.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
437
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Moss Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
507
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
516
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
499
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
470
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
437
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Moss Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Moss Elem
Parent district: Big Spring ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$6,986
Selected comparison
$13,161
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 rated schools reporting
−$6,175 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $6,986 per student for this campus, $14,721 per student for its parent district, Big Spring ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Moss Elem
Parent district: Big Spring ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,553
$10,558
$13,054
$8,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,310
$10,763
$13,108
$8,188
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,953 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,283
$11,188
$14,058
$8,740
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,113
$12,967
$14,797
$9,300
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,690
$13,334
$15,708
$10,582
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,232
$17,116
$16,792
$11,167
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,020 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,186
$15,118
$18,125
$12,341
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,043 rated schools reporting
2025
$6,986
$14,721
$18,972
$13,161
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$45,611−$21,038 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−21.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8+2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Moss Elem
Beginning 13.3%
1 to 5 years 55%
6 to 10 years 13.8%
11 to 20 years 13.8%
21 to 30 years 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 reporting for every category shown · 2,073 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
Beginning 7.8%
1 to 5 years 27.9%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 24.1%
21 to 30 years 13.1%
Over 30 years 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Howard County · 11 reporting for every category shown · 11 in full cohort
Beginning 8.7%
1 to 5 years 40.7%
6 to 10 years 14.7%
11 to 20 years 21.4%
21 to 30 years 10.6%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,626 reporting for every category shown · 3,626 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Moss Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMoss Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
25.1
18
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 20 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 7,358
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · full ranking
1of 11
Attendance
Howard County · of the 11 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
6of 11
Overall score
Howard County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 114901111.