+8.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 1,490 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
157 of 1,490tied with 90 others
Score vs region
+6.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
63 of 505tied with 27 others
Score vs county
+7.5 ptsvs 84.5 average · 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County
Hidalgo County placement
21 of 253tied with 14 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 2,540 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
277 of 2,540tied with 125 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.4 average for 1,490 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 2,540 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
71%vs 56.4% avg · +14.6 pts
Masters
45%vs 25.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Among 1,446 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Morris MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 1,490 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 157th of 1,490 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).
Morris MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 63rd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 27 others).
Morris MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 21st of 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County (tied with 14 others).
Morris MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 2,540 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 277th of 2,540 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 125 others).
Morris MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,446 reporting
School Progress92 A+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,443 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+12.3 vs similar economic context · 1,434 reporting
Academic Growth86 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,417 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,443 reporting
Morris MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,490 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
86
B
4
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 reporting
Meets grade level71%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 reporting
Masters grade level45%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,445 reporting
Meets grade level79%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,445 reporting
Masters grade level54%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,445 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 reporting
Meets grade level64%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 reporting
Masters grade level37%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 reporting
Meets grade level71%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 reporting
Masters grade level45%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Meets grade level66%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Masters grade level45%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,490 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,017
Economically disadvantaged
43.5%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.6%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.7%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.8%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Morris MS
African American 0.8%
Hispanic 87.6%
White 9.1%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1.4%
Two or More Races 1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,490 reporting for every category shown · 1,490 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 37.5%
White 44.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.8%
White 1.5%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,540 reporting for every category shown · 2,540 in full cohort
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 51.9%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,017
Economically disadvantaged students
442
Emergent bilingual students
128
Special education students
190
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
101
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,051
TEA-published mobility rate
9.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,017 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (1.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,017
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+18
Increase · +1.8%
Change since 2021–22
+4
Increase · +0.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,017
Selected comparison
685.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Morris MS
School year
Students enrolledMorris MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,013
First available year
684.5
2022–23
1,016
Increase of 3 (0.3%)
688.9
2023–24
1,036
Increase of 20 (2.0%)
689.4
2024–25
999
Decrease of 37 (3.6%)
686.4
2025–26
1,017
Increase of 18 (1.8%)
685.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
134
12.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
281
26.97 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,042
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
12.9%
Selected comparison
11.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,153 rated schools reporting
+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
26.97
Selected comparison
24.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,236 rated schools reporting
+2.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Morris MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,027
10
1.0%
11
1.07
9.2%
17.5
2021–22
1,036
208
20.1%
463
44.69
11.3%
24.1
2022–23
1,054
222
21.1%
635
60.25
11.6%
25.3
2023–24
1,065
174
16.3%
464
43.57
11.5%
25.8
2024–25
1,042
134
12.9%
281
26.97
11.1%
24.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Morris MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
134
12.9%
281
26.97
11.1%
24.2
In-school suspensions
124
11.9%
204
19.58
10.0%
18.5
Out-of-school suspensions
34
3.3%
48
4.61
5.4%
7.5
DAEP placements
22
2.1%
29
2.78
4.1%
4.9
Mandatory DAEP placements
12
1.1%
13
1.25
3.2%
3.7
Discretionary DAEP placements
13
1.3%
16
1.54
2.3%
2.7
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Morris MS
Parent district: McAllen ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,588
Selected comparison
$11,990
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,461 rated schools reporting
−$2,402 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,588 per student for this campus, $15,430 per student for its parent district, McAllen ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Morris MS
Parent district: McAllen ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,368
$10,890
$13,054
$7,779
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,340 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,542
$11,137
$13,108
$7,992
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,361 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,620
$12,367
$14,058
$8,417
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,701
$13,231
$14,797
$8,821
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,389 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,792
$15,975
$15,708
$10,185
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,402 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,690
$16,184
$16,792
$10,620
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,421 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,105
$16,737
$18,125
$11,654
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,437 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,588
$15,430
$18,972
$11,990
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,461 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,257−$1,962 vs similar economic context
Teachers
69+24.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7−6.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Morris MS
1 to 5 years 29.8%
6 to 10 years 16.1%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 14.3%
Over 30 years 7.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,490 reporting for every category shown · 1,490 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 23.7%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.4%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
Beginning 2.3%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 17.1%
11 to 20 years 37.2%
21 to 30 years 21.6%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,540 reporting for every category shown · 2,540 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Morris MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMorris MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
19.7
18
Secondary English
18.5
15.4
Secondary math
24.8
16.5
Secondary science
22.1
18
Secondary social studies
21.5
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 242
All Subjects — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 242
Reading — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
6of 91
Social Studies — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure
8of 239
Science — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 239 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 242
Reading — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
13of 242
All Subjects — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure
13of 242
Reading — Approaches
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 2
14of 241
Math — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 3
86of 2,504
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 2,504 that report this measure · tied with 50
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108906045.