Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Morgan Mill School

Erath County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 133 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
53/1002025-26
Change
−38 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−30.7 ptsvs 83.7 average · 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,437 of 1,439among reporting schools
F53

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Morgan Mill School is rated F by TEA, scoring 53 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 38 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,437th of 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
14.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMorgan Mill School 9175667853 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26F5383.7 1,439 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7884.0 1,409 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6682.2 1,387 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7582.8 1,372 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9184.8 1,352 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement59 F−25.0 vs similar economic context · 1,398 reporting
  • School Progress57 F−25.3 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps40 F−41.0 vs similar economic context · 1,386 reporting
  • Academic Growth57 F−20.3 vs similar economic context · 1,371 reporting
  • Relative Performance55 F−24.5 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
  • Morgan Mill School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement59F1
School Progress57F3
Closing the Gaps40F20
Academic Growth57F3
Relative Performance55F5

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (59), so School Progress (57) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 59.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level56%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level49%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level50%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
133
Economically disadvantaged
42.4%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.3%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.5%+5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.9%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Morgan Mill School

African American: 1.5%Hispanic: 21.2%White: 68.2%Asian: 0.8%Pacific Islander: 0.8%Two or More Races: 7.6%
  • African American 1.5%
  • Hispanic 21.2%
  • White 68.2%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 7.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.8%White: 44.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.8%
  • White 44.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
132
Economically disadvantaged students
56
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
31

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
108
TEA-published mobility rate
23.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 133 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (4.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
133

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+6

Increase · +4.7%

Change since 2021–22
+14

Increase · +11.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
133
Selected comparison
699.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Morgan Mill School
School yearStudents enrolledMorgan Mill SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 119 First available year 696.6
2022–23 117 Decrease of 2 (1.7%) 702.6
2023–24 122 Increase of 5 (4.3%) 703.7
2024–25 127 Increase of 5 (4.1%) 700.5
2025–26 133 Increase of 6 (4.7%) 699.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
142

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Morgan Mill School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 147 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 126 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 126 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 141 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 142 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Morgan Mill School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Morgan Mill School
  • Parent district: Morgan Mill ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,729
Selected comparison
$11,999

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting

−$2,270 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,729 per student for this campus, $19,347 per student for its parent district, Morgan Mill ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMorgan Mill SchoolParent district: Morgan Mill ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,548$10,182$13,054$7,803 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,292 rated schools reporting
2019$6,159$10,699$13,108$8,014 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,312 rated schools reporting
2020$8,247$15,456$14,058$8,410 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 rated schools reporting
2021$7,389$11,549$14,797$8,809 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 rated schools reporting
2022$7,851$12,495$15,708$10,150 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,353 rated schools reporting
2023$8,581$15,521$16,792$10,580 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 rated schools reporting
2024$9,613$18,628$18,125$11,637 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,388 rated schools reporting
2025$9,729$19,347$18,972$11,999 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$51,687−$15,610 vs similar economic context
Teachers
10−34.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.6−8.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Morgan Mill School

Beginning: 19.2%1 to 5 years: 28.8%6 to 10 years: 9.6%11 to 20 years: 30.8%21 to 30 years: 9.6%Over 30 years: 1.9%
  • Beginning 19.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 9.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.6%
  • Over 30 years 1.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.4%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Morgan Mill School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMorgan Mill School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten118
Grade 11718.5
Grade 21718.7
Grade 31319.4
Grade 41619.3
Grade 52220.6
Grade 611.317.9
Secondary English11.515.5
Secondary math7.716.6
Secondary science11.518
Secondary social studies11.517.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

4 measures

  • 4of 15

    Per-student spending

    Erath County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Attendance

    Erath County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Science — Masters

    Erath County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Science — Meets

    Erath County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 072910101.