Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Monta Jane Akin Elem

Williamson County · Region 13: Austin · 821 students

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.6 ptsvs 91.6 average · 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
263 of 444tied with 50 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Monta Jane Akin Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 263rd of 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMonta Jane Akin Elem 9092888891 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9191.6 444 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8892.1 436 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8891.2 425 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9291.6 413 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9092.2 405 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A−1.7 vs similar economic context · 436 reporting
  • School Progress87 B−0.8 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
  • Relative Performance59 F−19.1 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
  • Monta Jane Akin Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance59F1

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level86%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Masters grade level47%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
821
Economically disadvantaged
6.6%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.8%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.9%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Monta Jane Akin Elem

African American: 1.7%Hispanic: 12.7%White: 34.4%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 42.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 8.2%
  • African American 1.7%
  • Hispanic 12.7%
  • White 34.4%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 42.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 8.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort

African American: 4.8%Hispanic: 17.4%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 23.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 4.8%
  • Hispanic 17.4%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 23.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
817
Economically disadvantaged students
54
Emergent bilingual students
154
Special education students
130

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
799
TEA-published mobility rate
8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 821 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 51 (5.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
821

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−51

Decrease · −5.8%

Change since 2021–22
−61

Decrease · −6.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
821
Selected comparison
872.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Monta Jane Akin Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMonta Jane Akin ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 882 First available year 882.1
2022–23 875 Decrease of 7 (0.8%) 902.5
2023–24 927 Increase of 52 (5.9%) 890.9
2024–25 872 Decrease of 55 (5.9%) 883.7
2025–26 821 Decrease of 51 (5.8%) 872.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
22

2.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
41

4.52 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
908

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.4%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated schools reporting

−2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.52
Selected comparison
7.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting

−3.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Monta Jane Akin Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 922 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 948 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 918 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 964 Suppressed — 13 1.35 — 7.9
2024–25 908 22 2.4% 41 4.52 4.7% 7.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Monta Jane Akin Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 22 2.4% 41 4.52 4.7% 7.7
In-school suspensions 20 2.2% 37 4.07 4.4% 6.2
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Monta Jane Akin Elem
  • Parent district: Leander ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,013
Selected comparison
$10,821

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting

−$2,808 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,013 per student for this campus, $20,543 per student for its parent district, Leander ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMonta Jane Akin ElemParent district: Leander ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,136$11,627$13,054$7,204 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 rated schools reporting
2019$5,292$15,265$13,108$7,342 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 rated schools reporting
2020$5,527$9,781$14,058$7,641 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated schools reporting
2021$6,891$14,703$14,797$8,261 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 398 rated schools reporting
2022$6,382$14,776$15,708$9,493 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
2023$6,783$14,111$16,792$9,527 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
2024$7,103$18,103$18,125$10,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 425 rated schools reporting
2025$8,013$20,543$18,972$10,821 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,490−$6,012 vs similar economic context
Teachers
57+1.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3−0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Monta Jane Akin Elem

Beginning: 1.7%1 to 5 years: 41.9%6 to 10 years: 17.5%11 to 20 years: 25%21 to 30 years: 12.2%Over 30 years: 1.7%
  • Beginning 1.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 41.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 25%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.2%
  • Over 30 years 1.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 31.8%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Monta Jane Akin Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMonta Jane Akin Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.819
Grade 121.419.3
Grade 218.319.7
Grade 318.921.6
Grade 420.320.4
Grade 521.222.4
Grade 623.218.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246913126.