+9.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
104 of 1,469tied with 50 others
Score vs region
+12.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo
Region 15: San Angelo placement
12 of 124tied with 2 others
Score vs county
+9.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 8 rated schools in Runnels County
Score vs similar-size group
+12.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,443 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
203 of 2,443tied with 57 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.5 average for 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo.The current score is above the 83.9 average for 8 rated schools in Runnels County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 2,443 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
79%vs 56.6% avg · +22.4 pts
Masters
48%vs 25.6% avg · +22.4 pts
Among 1,425 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Miles Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 104th of 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).
Miles Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 12th of 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo (tied with 2 others).
Miles Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 8 rated schools in Runnels County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Miles Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 2,443 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 203rd of 2,443 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 57 others).
Miles Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,425 reporting
School Progress92 A+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,422 reporting
Closing the Gaps89 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,413 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,398 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,422 reporting
Miles Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,469 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
89
B
1
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
92
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,425 reporting
Meets grade level79%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,425 reporting
Masters grade level48%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,425 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
Meets grade level82%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
Masters grade level56%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
Meets grade level83%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
Masters grade level44%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
Meets grade level55%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
Masters grade level35%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,469 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
282
Economically disadvantaged
43.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.5%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.9%−12.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Miles Elem
African American 1.4%
Hispanic 38.1%
White 58.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 reporting for every category shown · 1,469 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 37.2%
White 44.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 15: San Angelo · 124 reporting for every category shown · 124 in full cohort
African American 1.5%
Hispanic 51.7%
White 43.8%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Runnels County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
African American 0.8%
Hispanic 49.3%
White 47.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,443 reporting for every category shown · 2,443 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 52.1%
White 31.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
281
Economically disadvantaged students
121
Emergent bilingual students
24
Special education students
50
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
13
Students in TEA mobility denominator
233
TEA-published mobility rate
5.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 282 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (4.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
282
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+13
Increase · +4.8%
Change since 2021–22
+21
Increase · +8.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
282
Selected comparison
693.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,434 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Miles Elem
School year
Students enrolledMiles Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
261
First available year
691.4
2022–23
279
Increase of 18 (6.9%)
696.9
2023–24
281
Increase of 2 (0.7%)
698
2024–25
269
Decrease of 12 (4.3%)
694.6
2025–26
282
Increase of 13 (4.8%)
693.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
280
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Miles Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
275
12
4.4%
12
4.36
9.2%
17.4
2021–22
283
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
298
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
287
Suppressed
—
10
3.48
—
25.8
2024–25
280
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Miles Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Miles Elem
Parent district: Miles ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,111
Selected comparison
$12,006
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting
−$3,895 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,111 per student for this campus, $18,245 per student for its parent district, Miles ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Miles Elem
Parent district: Miles ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,858
$11,494
$13,054
$7,784
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,322 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,572
$12,599
$13,108
$7,991
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,342 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,666
$12,834
$14,058
$8,407
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,350 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,300
$13,432
$14,797
$8,817
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,210
$15,112
$15,708
$10,190
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,192
$14,397
$16,792
$10,624
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,311
$15,339
$18,125
$11,650
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,417 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,111
$18,245
$18,972
$12,006
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$55,678−$11,514 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−23.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−7.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Miles Elem
Beginning 3.8%
1 to 5 years 14.2%
6 to 10 years 9.5%
11 to 20 years 46.9%
21 to 30 years 25.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 reporting for every category shown · 1,469 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 30.5%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 15: San Angelo · 124 reporting for every category shown · 124 in full cohort
Beginning 7%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 16.6%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Runnels County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
Beginning 8.4%
1 to 5 years 19.4%
6 to 10 years 16.4%
11 to 20 years 31.6%
21 to 30 years 20.6%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,443 reporting for every category shown · 2,443 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Miles Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMiles Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
15
18
Grade 1
20
18.5
Grade 2
17
18.7
Grade 3
20.5
19.4
Grade 4
18
19.3
Grade 5
22
20.5
Grade 6
16.2
18
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
7 measures
2of 123
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 123 that report this measure
2of 119
Reading — Approaches
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 119 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 119
Reading — Masters
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 119 that report this measure
2of 119
Math — Meets
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 119 that report this measure
2of 119
Math — Masters
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 119 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 120
All Subjects — Masters
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 120 that report this measure
3of 118
Academic Growth
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 118 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 120
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 120 that report this measure
4of 119
Reading — Meets
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 119 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 119
Math — Approaches
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 119 that report this measure
5of 120
All Subjects — Meets
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 120 that report this measure
6of 123
Attendance
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 123 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 120
Relative Performance
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 120 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 200902101.