Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Midlothian Heritage HS

Ellis County · Region 10: Richardson · 1,772 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+11 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.8 ptsvs 89.2 average · 831 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
81 of 831tied with 66 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89.2 average for 831 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 5 points

89 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 94 is 4.8 points above the 89.2 average among 831 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 11 points

83 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 94 is 7.3 points above the 86.7 average among 812 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
83%vs 66.2% avg · +16.8 pts
Masters
48%vs 39.1% avg · +8.9 pts

Among 752 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Midlothian Heritage HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89.2 average for 831 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 11 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 81st of 831 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMidlothian Heritage HS 8383918994 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9489.2 831 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8989.1 825 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9187.9 810 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8388.4 794 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8389.3 780 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+4.0 vs similar economic context · 818 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 816 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+7.3 vs similar economic context · 812 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C−3.7 vs similar economic context · 805 reporting
  • Relative Performance88 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 816 reporting
  • Midlothian Heritage HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (831 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance88B2

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level89%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 752 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 752 reporting
  • Masters grade level48%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 752 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (831 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
98.7%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
97.8%+8.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 205 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.7%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.7%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+8.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria98.0%89.4%+8.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course86.2%67.5%+18.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA34.7%49.9%−15.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)26.4%27.0%−0.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course28.6%38.3%−9.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification25.1%31.5%−6.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.8%0.4%+0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree4.3%3.7%+0.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%7.8%−7.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness4.8%2.3%+2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.8%6.0%−0.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.5%2.7%+0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
354

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
178

50.3% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
170

48.0% of graduates

Not trackable
6

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
354
Selected comparison
368.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
178
Selected comparison
179.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
50.3%
Selected comparison
50.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated schools reporting

+0.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
48.0%
Selected comparison
41.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated schools reporting

+6.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
1.7%
Selected comparison
8.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated schools reporting

−6.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. NAVARRO COLLEGE (003593)42
  2. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY (003644)23
  3. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)12

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,772
Economically disadvantaged
22.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.0%−6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.8%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.1%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Midlothian Heritage HS

African American: 13.5%Hispanic: 27.2%White: 53.1%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 0.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.9%
  • African American 13.5%
  • Hispanic 27.2%
  • White 53.1%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting for every category shown · 831 in full cohort

African American: 8.1%Hispanic: 25.9%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 11.8%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.2%
  • African American 8.1%
  • Hispanic 25.9%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 11.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,772
Economically disadvantaged students
398
Emergent bilingual students
70
Special education students
191

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
131
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,785
TEA-published mobility rate
7.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,772 students in 2025–26, an increase of 12 (0.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,772

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+12

Increase · +0.7%

Change since 2021–22
+611

Increase · +52.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,772
Selected comparison
863.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 826 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Midlothian Heritage HS
School yearStudents enrolledMidlothian Heritage HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,161 First available year 880.6
2022–23 1,490 Increase of 329 (28.3%) 885.5
2023–24 1,603 Increase of 113 (7.6%) 879.8
2024–25 1,760 Increase of 157 (9.8%) 873.2
2025–26 1,772 Increase of 12 (0.7%) 863.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
168

9.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
452

24.94 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,812

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.3%
Selected comparison
7.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 592 rated schools reporting

+1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
24.94
Selected comparison
14.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 673 rated schools reporting

+10.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Midlothian Heritage HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,126 35 3.1% 48 4.26 5.6% 9.6
2021–22 1,198 80 6.7% 160 13.36 7.7% 15.2
2022–23 1,544 158 10.2% 340 22.02 8.0% 15.7
2023–24 1,668 109 6.5% 275 16.49 7.6% 15.2
2024–25 1,812 168 9.3% 452 24.94 7.5% 14.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Midlothian Heritage HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 168 9.3% 452 24.94 7.5% 14.6
In-school suspensions 134 7.4% 250 13.80 6.8% 11.6
Out-of-school suspensions 90 5.0% 133 7.34 3.6% 4.8
DAEP placements 60 3.3% 69 3.81 2.6% 2.9
Mandatory DAEP placements 48 2.6% 50 2.76 2.2% 2.3
Discretionary DAEP placements 18 1.0% 19 1.05 1.3% 1.4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$20k$33k20182020202220242025
  • Midlothian Heritage HS
  • Parent district: Midlothian ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,641
Selected comparison
$11,171

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 rated schools reporting

−$3,530 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,641 per student for this campus, $14,691 per student for its parent district, Midlothian ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMidlothian Heritage HSParent district: Midlothian ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,990$13,460$13,054$7,487 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 732 rated schools reporting
2019$6,901$18,272$13,108$7,549 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 747 rated schools reporting
2020$7,280$22,901$14,058$7,869 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 757 rated schools reporting
2021$7,620$20,895$14,797$8,417 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 762 rated schools reporting
2022$31,630$20,156$15,708$9,466 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 779 rated schools reporting
2023$10,949$15,147$16,792$10,010 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 795 rated schools reporting
2024$7,842$15,086$18,125$11,069 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 rated schools reporting
2025$7,641$14,691$18,972$11,171 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,143−$627 vs similar economic context
Teachers
98+42.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.2+3.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Midlothian Heritage HS

Beginning: 2.7%1 to 5 years: 31.2%6 to 10 years: 20.2%11 to 20 years: 35.2%21 to 30 years: 10.8%
  • Beginning 2.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting for every category shown · 831 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.7%1 to 5 years: 22.6%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 17.1%Over 30 years: 3%
  • Beginning 4.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%
  • Over 30 years 3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Midlothian Heritage HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMidlothian Heritage HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English20.417.7
Secondary languages other than English29.219.8
Secondary math23.318.3
Secondary science26.820.1
Secondary social studies27.120.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 13

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

13 measures

  • 2of 64

    Overall score

    Ellis County · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 60

    Student Achievement

    Ellis County · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 59

    Closing the Gaps

    Ellis County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 51

    Science — Meets

    Ellis County · of the 51 that report this measure

  • 2of 51

    Science — Masters

    Ellis County · of the 51 that report this measure

  • 2of 25

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Ellis County · of the 25 that report this measure

  • 2of 25

    Social Studies — Meets

    Ellis County · of the 25 that report this measure

  • 2of 25

    Social Studies — Masters

    Ellis County · of the 25 that report this measure

  • 3of 60

    All Subjects — Meets

    Ellis County · of the 60 that report this measure

  • 3of 51

    Science — Approaches

    Ellis County · of the 51 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 12

    Four-Year Graduation Rate

    Ellis County (standard accountability only) · of the 12 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

17 measures

  • 4of 13

    College, career or military ready

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 5of 60

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Ellis County · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 59

    Relative Performance

    Ellis County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 5of 13

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Earned an associate degree

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 60

    Reading — Meets

    Ellis County · of the 60 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 13

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 59

    School Progress

    Ellis County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 8of 13

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Six-Year Graduation Rate

    Ellis County (standard accountability only) · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Ellis County (standard accountability only) · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 60

    All Subjects — Masters

    Ellis County · of the 60 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    Five-Year Graduation Rate

    Ellis County (standard accountability only) · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 59

    Math — Approaches

    Ellis County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 13

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Ellis County · of the 13 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 070908003.