Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Midland Alternative Program

Midland County · Region 18: Midland · 120 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Midland Alternative Program for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Midland Alternative Program for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—78.6 2,082 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—78.2 2,066 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—76.1 2,054 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—76.6 2,027 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.7 2,011 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 74.7 · 1,941 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 79.8 · 1,935 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 75.9 · 1,920 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.8 · 1,874 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 78.2 · 1,935 reporting
  • Midland Alternative Program
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,082 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level18%−53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
  • Meets grade level3%−42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level17%−56 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Meets grade level4%−45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level15%−53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level17%−53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level27%−44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 reporting
  • Meets grade level9%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,082 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
120
Economically disadvantaged
74.2%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.0%−3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.0%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
81.5%−12.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
58.4%+39.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Midland Alternative Program

African American: 11.7%Hispanic: 72.5%White: 12.5%Asian: 0.8%Pacific Islander: 0.8%Two or More Races: 1.7%
  • African American 11.7%
  • Hispanic 72.5%
  • White 12.5%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 1.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting for every category shown · 2,082 in full cohort

African American: 12.9%Hispanic: 61%White: 20.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 12.9%
  • Hispanic 61%
  • White 20.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
120
Economically disadvantaged students
89
Emergent bilingual students
24
Special education students
18

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
736
Students in TEA mobility denominator
736
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
256

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
640

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Midland Alternative Program
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported 16 — 36 — — —
2021–22 Not reported 20 — 40 — — —
2022–23 Not reported 41 — 89 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 28 — 91 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 256 — 640 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Midland Alternative Program in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 256 — 640 — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 255 — 557 — — —
DAEP placements 55 — 63 — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$127k$248k20182020202220242025
  • Midland Alternative Program
  • Parent district: Midland ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$18,460
Selected comparison
$13,150

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting

+$5,310 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $18,460 per student for this campus, $18,529 per student for its parent district, Midland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMidland Alternative ProgramParent district: Midland ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$129,201$8,732$13,054$8,048 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 rated schools reporting
2019$85,851$9,076$13,108$8,187 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,959 rated schools reporting
2020$235,913$10,668$14,058$8,732 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2021$206,098$12,683$14,797$9,281 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting
2022$99,287$12,705$15,708$10,572 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 rated schools reporting
2023$91,278$13,012$16,792$11,183 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,027 rated schools reporting
2024$139,949$14,999$18,125$12,326 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,052 rated schools reporting
2025$18,460$18,529$18,972$13,150 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$66,924+$304 vs similar economic context
Teachers
16−27.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.3−6.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Midland Alternative Program

Beginning: 3.7%1 to 5 years: 42.7%6 to 10 years: 6.1%11 to 20 years: 11.6%21 to 30 years: 29.9%Over 30 years: 6.1%
  • Beginning 3.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 42.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 6.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 11.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 29.9%
  • Over 30 years 6.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting for every category shown · 2,082 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.3%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 165901030.