Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Michael Elem

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 529 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.7 ptsvs 78.7 average · 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,148 of 2,083tied with 82 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.7 average for 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
54%vs 49.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Masters
28%vs 19.3% avg · +8.7 pts

Among 1,941 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

81 +5 pts vs 76

  • 81 is 5 points above the 76 average among 1,923 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Michael Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.7 average for 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,148th of 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMichael Elem 7869597778 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7878.7 2,083 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7778.2 2,067 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5976.1 2,055 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6976.6 2,029 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7881.8 2,014 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,944 reporting
  • School Progress77 C−2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,938 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,923 reporting
  • Academic Growth76 C+3.2 vs similar economic context · 1,877 reporting
  • Relative Performance77 C−1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,938 reporting
  • Michael Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,083 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress77C3
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth76C4
Relative Performance77C3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (77), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 reporting
  • Meets grade level21%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,083 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
529
Economically disadvantaged
74.1%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.7%−20.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
27.0%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.6%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.9%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Michael Elem

African American: 5.5%Hispanic: 85%White: 6.1%Asian: 0.8%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 5.5%
  • Hispanic 85%
  • White 6.1%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,083 reporting for every category shown · 2,083 in full cohort

African American: 12.9%Hispanic: 60.8%White: 20.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 12.9%
  • Hispanic 60.8%
  • White 20.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
526
Economically disadvantaged students
390
Emergent bilingual students
14
Special education students
142

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
42
Students in TEA mobility denominator
410
TEA-published mobility rate
10.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 529 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 1 (0.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
529

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−1

Decrease · −0.2%

Change since 2021–22
−46

Decrease · −8.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
529
Selected comparison
641.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,052 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Michael Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMichael ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 575 First available year 658
2022–23 559 Decrease of 16 (2.8%) 662.7
2023–24 524 Decrease of 35 (6.3%) 659.6
2024–25 530 Increase of 6 (1.1%) 657.3
2025–26 529 Decrease of 1 (0.2%) 641.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
19

3.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
26

4.63 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
562

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.4%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,574 rated schools reporting

−9.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.63
Selected comparison
31.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 rated schools reporting

−27.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Michael Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 690 16 2.3% 27 3.91 9.2% 18.3
2021–22 637 57 8.9% 119 18.68 13.0% 31
2022–23 593 84 14.2% 207 34.91 13.6% 33.3
2023–24 570 42 7.4% 79 13.86 13.5% 33.1
2024–25 562 19 3.4% 26 4.63 13.2% 31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Michael Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 19 3.4% 26 4.63 13.2% 31.8
In-school suspensions 15 2.7% 18 3.20 11.8% 23.6
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Michael Elem
  • Parent district: Northside ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,391
Selected comparison
$13,155

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting

−$764 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,391 per student for this campus, $17,197 per student for its parent district, Northside ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMichael ElemParent district: Northside ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,423$12,117$13,054$8,049 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting
2019$7,840$12,287$13,108$8,190 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2020$7,913$13,205$14,058$8,733 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2021$8,546$14,126$14,797$9,279 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting
2022$10,264$14,599$15,708$10,596 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,014 rated schools reporting
2023$11,783$15,840$16,792$11,191 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,029 rated schools reporting
2024$11,859$17,624$18,125$12,337 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting
2025$12,391$17,197$18,972$13,155 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,939+$331 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−5.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14−0.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Michael Elem

Beginning: 10.9%1 to 5 years: 45.2%6 to 10 years: 13.3%11 to 20 years: 19.9%21 to 30 years: 8%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 10.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 19.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 8%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,083 reporting for every category shown · 2,083 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.3%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.3%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Michael Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMichael Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.617.9
Grade 118.318.2
Grade 22318.3
Grade 31818.6
Grade 421.418.9
Grade 526.519.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015915162.