Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Meadow Wood Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 637 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−3.3 ptsvs 88.3 average · 914 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
683 of 914tied with 25 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 88.3 average for 914 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

6.8% −3 pts vs 9.8%

  • 6.8% is 3 percentage points lower than the 9.8% average among 897 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Meadow Wood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 88.3 average for 914 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 683rd of 914 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMeadow Wood Elem 8288868585 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8588.3 914 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8588.2 904 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8687.0 892 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8887.3 877 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8288.4 861 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B−0.1 vs similar economic context · 895 reporting
  • School Progress82 B−2.9 vs similar economic context · 893 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C−9.9 vs similar economic context · 888 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+0.4 vs similar economic context · 879 reporting
  • Relative Performance74 C−6.0 vs similar economic context · 893 reporting
  • Meadow Wood Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (914 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance74C6

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Masters grade level44%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 893 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 893 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 893 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 819 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 819 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 819 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (914 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
637
Economically disadvantaged
26.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.9%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.0%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.8%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Meadow Wood Elem

African American: 9.6%Hispanic: 22.4%White: 58.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5%
  • African American 9.6%
  • Hispanic 22.4%
  • White 58.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 reporting for every category shown · 914 in full cohort

African American: 8.7%Hispanic: 27.9%White: 48.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 9.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.1%
  • African American 8.7%
  • Hispanic 27.9%
  • White 48.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 9.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
635
Economically disadvantaged students
165
Emergent bilingual students
82
Special education students
127

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
39
Students in TEA mobility denominator
576
TEA-published mobility rate
6.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 637 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 49 (7.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
637

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−49

Decrease · −7.1%

Change since 2021–22
−16

Decrease · −2.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
637
Selected comparison
831.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Meadow Wood Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMeadow Wood ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 653 First available year 846
2022–23 657 Increase of 4 (0.6%) 850.2
2023–24 631 Decrease of 26 (4.0%) 846.1
2024–25 686 Increase of 55 (8.7%) 842
2025–26 637 Decrease of 49 (7.1%) 831.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
43

6.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
74

10.54 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
702

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
6.1%
Selected comparison
7.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 665 rated schools reporting

−1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.54
Selected comparison
15.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 751 rated schools reporting

−5.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Meadow Wood Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 628 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 670 10 1.5% 15 2.24 8.3% 16.6
2022–23 689 15 2.2% 26 3.77 8.6% 17.4
2023–24 666 16 2.4% 32 4.80 8.1% 16.6
2024–25 702 43 6.1% 74 10.54 7.9% 15.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Meadow Wood Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 43 6.1% 74 10.54 7.9% 15.8
In-school suspensions 29 4.1% 44 6.27 7.2% 12.4
Out-of-school suspensions 20 2.9% 26 3.70 3.9% 5.2
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Meadow Wood Elem
  • Parent district: Spring Branch ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,589
Selected comparison
$11,320

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 rated schools reporting

−$1,731 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,589 per student for this campus, $21,125 per student for its parent district, Spring Branch ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMeadow Wood ElemParent district: Spring Branch ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,289$12,780$13,054$7,547 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 808 rated schools reporting
2019$8,241$13,329$13,108$7,631 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 rated schools reporting
2020$7,764$16,243$14,058$7,946 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 834 rated schools reporting
2021$8,548$21,382$14,797$8,408 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 842 rated schools reporting
2022$8,745$18,728$15,708$9,596 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 860 rated schools reporting
2023$9,700$19,038$16,792$10,146 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 rated schools reporting
2024$9,815$20,245$18,125$11,284 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 891 rated schools reporting
2025$9,589$21,125$18,972$11,320 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,510+$4,064 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48−5.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−1.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Meadow Wood Elem

Beginning: 10.4%1 to 5 years: 23.6%6 to 10 years: 23.8%11 to 20 years: 25.5%21 to 30 years: 16.9%
  • Beginning 10.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 25.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 reporting for every category shown · 914 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Meadow Wood Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMeadow Wood Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.318.5
Grade 12019
Grade 22219.6
Grade 32420.6
Grade 420.820.1
Grade 524.221.8
Grade 6619.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101920108.