Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Mcgown Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 1,399 students

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+2.7 ptsvs 91.3 average · 581 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
97 of 581tied with 66 others
A94

At a glance

The available rating history is flat. The current score is above the 91.3 average for 581 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
81%vs 75% avg · +6 pts
Masters
58%vs 45.3% avg · +12.7 pts

Among 572 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
78%vs 71.5% avg · +6.5 pts
Masters
53%vs 40.7% avg · +12.3 pts

Among 570 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
86%vs 79.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Masters
64%vs 48.6% avg · +15.4 pts

Among 572 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Mcgown Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.3 average for 581 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2022-23.

Ranks 97th of 581 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMcgown Elem 94939494 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9491.3 581 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9491.6 571 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9390.8 557 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9491.2 541 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+1.7 vs similar economic context · 572 reporting
  • School Progress93 A+5.4 vs similar economic context · 570 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+5.1 vs similar economic context · 569 reporting
  • Academic Growth93 A+7.1 vs similar economic context · 568 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+6.5 vs similar economic context · 570 reporting
  • Mcgown Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (581 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress93A—
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth93A—
Relative Performance85B5

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 572 reporting
  • Meets grade level81%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 572 reporting
  • Masters grade level58%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 572 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 572 reporting
  • Meets grade level86%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 572 reporting
  • Masters grade level64%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 572 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 570 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 570 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 570 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Masters grade level54%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (581 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,399
Economically disadvantaged
11.1%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
22.1%+11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.1%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.8%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Mcgown Elem

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 19.9%White: 29.5%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 32.3%Two or More Races: 8.2%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 19.9%
  • White 29.5%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 32.3%
  • Two or More Races 8.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 581 reporting for every category shown · 581 in full cohort

African American: 5.7%Hispanic: 18.7%White: 48.1%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 21.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 5.7%
  • Hispanic 18.7%
  • White 48.1%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 21.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,387
Economically disadvantaged students
154
Emergent bilingual students
306
Special education students
196

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
58
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,146
TEA-published mobility rate
5.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,399 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (0.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,399

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−9

Decrease · −0.6%

Change since 2022–23
+296

Increase · +26.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,399
Selected comparison
866.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 577 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Mcgown Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMcgown ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 1,103 First available year 899.9
2023–24 1,370 Increase of 267 (24.2%) 886.3
2024–25 1,408 Increase of 38 (2.8%) 878.8
2025–26 1,399 Decrease of 9 (0.6%) 866.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
57

3.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
80

5.51 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,453

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.9%
Selected comparison
5.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 343 rated schools reporting

−1.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
5.51
Selected comparison
9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 rated schools reporting

−3.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Mcgown Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 1,185 19 1.6% 38 3.21 5.5% 9.3
2023–24 1,440 19 1.3% 59 4.10 5.2% 9.2
2024–25 1,453 57 3.9% 80 5.51 5.1% 9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Mcgown Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 57 3.9% 80 5.51 5.1% 9
In-school suspensions 57 3.9% 78 5.37 4.8% 7.3
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20232025
  • Mcgown Elem
  • Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$6,525
Selected comparison
$10,721

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 571 rated schools reporting

−$4,196 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $6,525 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMcgown ElemParent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$6,436$15,990$16,792$9,507 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 541 rated schools reporting
2024$6,357$16,047$18,125$10,395 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 558 rated schools reporting
2025$6,525$16,633$18,972$10,721 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 571 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,072+$3,778 vs similar economic context
Teachers
81+24.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.2+2.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Mcgown Elem

Beginning: 5%1 to 5 years: 27.3%6 to 10 years: 27.7%11 to 20 years: 27.7%21 to 30 years: 9.9%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 581 reporting for every category shown · 581 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.6%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 32.2%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Mcgown Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMcgown Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten21.918.9
Grade 120.919.1
Grade 221.119.7
Grade 321.321.4
Grade 421.520.4
Grade 527.722.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

10 measures

  • 29of 874

    Reading — Masters

    Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 30of 1,123

    Academic Growth

    Similar size · of the 1,123 that report this measure · tied with 17

  • 33of 874

    All Subjects — Masters

    Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 34of 873

    Math — Masters

    Harris County · of the 873 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 46of 874

    Reading — Meets

    Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 287of 7,260

    All Subjects — Meets

    Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 34

  • 295of 7,227

    Math — Meets

    Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 39

  • 339of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 136 · full ranking

  • 350of 6,717

    Science — Masters

    Texas average · of the 6,717 that report this measure · tied with 32

  • 363of 7,254

    Reading — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 108

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907160.