±0.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,902 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
951 of 1,902tied with 78 others
Score vs region
+0.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
397 of 839tied with 28 others
Score vs county
+1.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
213 of 466tied with 19 others
Score vs similar-size group
+0.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 3,871 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,915 of 3,871tied with 128 others
Score vs state
−0.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,141 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B81
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 81 average for 1,902 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 3,871 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
56%vs 50.6% avg · +5.4 pts
Masters
25%vs 21.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Among 1,831 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81 average for 1,902 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 951st of 1,902 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 397th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 28 others).
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 213th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 19 others).
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 3,871 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,915th of 3,871 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 128 others).
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement79 C−0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
School Progress81 B−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,823 reporting
Closing the Gaps80 B+1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,807 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,772 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,823 reporting
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,902 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
79
C
1
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
80
B
10
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so
Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level74%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,831 reporting
Meets grade level56%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,831 reporting
Masters grade level25%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,831 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Meets grade level63%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Masters grade level27%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting
Meets grade level50%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting
Masters grade level23%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,902 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
389
Economically disadvantaged
57.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.4%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.1%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.6%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
African American 27.7%
Hispanic 30.3%
White 31.1%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 1.8%
Two or More Races 8.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting for every category shown · 1,902 in full cohort
African American 10%
Hispanic 45.9%
White 37.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,871 reporting for every category shown · 3,871 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 26.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
386
Economically disadvantaged students
220
Emergent bilingual students
57
Special education students
94
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
49
Students in TEA mobility denominator
359
TEA-published mobility rate
13.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 389 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 51 (11.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
389
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−51
Decrease · −11.6%
Change since 2021–22
−52
Decrease · −11.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
389
Selected comparison
629.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
School year
Students enrolledMary Jo Sheppard Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
441
First available year
634.4
2022–23
455
Increase of 14 (3.2%)
640.6
2023–24
456
Increase of 1 (0.2%)
639.2
2024–25
440
Decrease of 16 (3.5%)
635.6
2025–26
389
Decrease of 51 (11.6%)
629.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
3.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
23
4.93 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
467
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.9%
Selected comparison
12.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,440 rated schools reporting
−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.93
Selected comparison
27.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,564 rated schools reporting
−22.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
470
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
469
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
492
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
484
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
467
18
3.9%
23
4.93
12.4%
27.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Mary Jo Sheppard Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
3.9%
23
4.93
12.4%
27.7
In-school suspensions
18
3.9%
23
4.93
11.2%
21.6
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
Parent district: Mansfield ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,644
Selected comparison
$12,396
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
−$752 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,644 per student for this campus, $16,334 per student for its parent district, Mansfield ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
Parent district: Mansfield ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,924
$11,552
$13,054
$7,949
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,726 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,278
$13,103
$13,108
$8,109
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,951
$14,760
$14,058
$8,704
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,765 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,813
$13,518
$14,797
$9,080
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,606
$12,626
$15,708
$10,499
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,220
$13,556
$16,792
$11,052
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,820 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,693
$14,418
$18,125
$11,835
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,644
$16,334
$18,972
$12,396
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$74,520+$7,979 vs similar economic context
Teachers
34−7.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.3−7.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Mary Jo Sheppard Elem
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 11.7%
11 to 20 years 38.1%
21 to 30 years 20.8%
Over 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting for every category shown · 1,902 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,871 reporting for every category shown · 3,871 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Mary Jo Sheppard Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMary Jo Sheppard Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
23
17.9
Grade 1
17.3
18.2
Grade 2
20.7
18.4
Grade 3
20.5
18.8
Grade 4
20.3
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220908118.