Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Margaret S McWhirter Elem

Galveston County · Region 04: Houston · 721 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
+8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.0 ptsvs 78 average · 2,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
673 of 2,111tied with 78 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78 average for 2,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

80 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 5 points above the 78 average among 2,111 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 7 points

79 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 8.4 points above the 77.6 average among 1,947 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
52%vs 43% avg · +9 pts
Masters
26%vs 17% avg · +9 pts

Among 1,952 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Margaret S McWhirter Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78 average for 2,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 673rd of 2,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMargaret S McWhirter Elem 7581788083 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8378.0 2,111 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8077.6 2,100 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7875.2 2,086 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8175.6 2,067 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7581.6 2,047 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement79 C+5.9 vs similar economic context · 1,952 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,947 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C+0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+8.4 vs similar economic context · 1,947 reporting
  • Margaret S McWhirter Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,111 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement79C1
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance86B4

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level77%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,111 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
721
Economically disadvantaged
77.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
55.0%+28.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.7%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.1%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Margaret S McWhirter Elem

African American: 12.5%Hispanic: 69.7%White: 10.3%Asian: 4%Two or More Races: 3.5%
  • African American 12.5%
  • Hispanic 69.7%
  • White 10.3%
  • Asian 4%
  • Two or More Races 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 reporting for every category shown · 2,111 in full cohort

African American: 13.8%Hispanic: 65.1%White: 15.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.8%
  • African American 13.8%
  • Hispanic 65.1%
  • White 15.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
720
Economically disadvantaged students
560
Emergent bilingual students
396
Special education students
156

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
137
Students in TEA mobility denominator
687
TEA-published mobility rate
19.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 721 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 89 (11.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
721

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−89

Decrease · −11.0%

Change since 2021–22
−72

Decrease · −9.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
721
Selected comparison
635.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Margaret S McWhirter Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMargaret S McWhirter ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 793 First available year 657.4
2022–23 789 Decrease of 4 (0.5%) 660.9
2023–24 768 Decrease of 21 (2.7%) 656.4
2024–25 810 Increase of 42 (5.5%) 654.3
2025–26 721 Decrease of 89 (11.0%) 635.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
70

7.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
97

10.90 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
890

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
7.9%
Selected comparison
13.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting

−5.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.9
Selected comparison
32.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,687 rated schools reporting

−21.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Margaret S McWhirter Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 839 35 4.2% 61 7.27 8.7% 17.3
2021–22 871 66 7.6% 103 11.83 12.9% 31.1
2022–23 884 48 5.4% 78 8.82 13.7% 34
2023–24 863 78 9.0% 134 15.53 13.7% 33.9
2024–25 890 70 7.9% 97 10.90 13.4% 32.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Margaret S McWhirter Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 70 7.9% 97 10.90 13.4% 32.4
In-school suspensions 62 7.0% 85 9.55 11.7% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions 10 1.1% 10 1.12 8.1% 12.7
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Margaret S McWhirter Elem
  • Parent district: Clear Creek ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,791
Selected comparison
$13,036

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,099 rated schools reporting

−$3,245 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,791 per student for this campus, $15,801 per student for its parent district, Clear Creek ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMargaret S McWhirter ElemParent district: Clear Creek ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,613$12,387$13,054$8,073 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2019$7,679$13,243$13,108$8,222 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 rated schools reporting
2020$8,334$13,080$14,058$8,730 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting
2021$9,196$14,249$14,797$9,348 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,030 rated schools reporting
2022$8,911$13,350$15,708$10,726 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 rated schools reporting
2023$8,993$14,031$16,792$11,267 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,067 rated schools reporting
2024$9,943$14,786$18,125$12,285 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,086 rated schools reporting
2025$9,791$15,801$18,972$13,036 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,099 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,498+$5,691 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48+4.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+1.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Margaret S McWhirter Elem

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 21%6 to 10 years: 23.1%11 to 20 years: 32.9%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 2.1%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 21%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 reporting for every category shown · 2,111 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Margaret S McWhirter Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMargaret S McWhirter Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2318
Grade 11918.3
Grade 222.618.4
Grade 317.718.8
Grade 42219
Grade 518.820

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 084910107.