Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Manor New Technology MS

Travis County · Region 13: Austin · 759 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
61/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−18.8 ptsvs 79.8 average · 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,920 of 2,001tied with 8 others
D61

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 72 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.8 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

10.3% −6.6 pts vs 16.9%

  • 10.3% is 6.6 percentage points lower than the 16.9% average among 1,936 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

95.1% +1 pts vs 94.1%

  • 95.1% is 1 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 1,936 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Manor New Technology MS is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.8 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,920th of 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 8 others).

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
28.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
3.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageManor New Technology MS 6973646861 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6179.8 2,001 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6879.5 1,977 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6477.6 1,963 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7378.2 1,931 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6982.1 1,910 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement62 D−15.5 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • School Progress59 F−21.7 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps59 F−18.0 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
  • Academic Growth57 F−16.9 vs similar economic context · 1,827 reporting
  • Relative Performance59 F−20.1 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Manor New Technology MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement62D8
School Progress59F1
Closing the Gaps59F1
Academic Growth57F3
Relative Performance59F1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (62), so School Progress (59) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 62.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level56%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level50%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level53%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level43%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
759
Economically disadvantaged
65.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
41.2%+23.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.3%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.3%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Manor New Technology MS

African American: 16.2%Hispanic: 66.4%White: 6.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 7.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 16.2%
  • Hispanic 66.4%
  • White 6.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 7.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort

African American: 11.4%Hispanic: 52.3%White: 29.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.4%
  • Hispanic 52.3%
  • White 29.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
759
Economically disadvantaged students
497
Emergent bilingual students
313
Special education students
86

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
749
TEA-published mobility rate
1.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 759 students in 2025–26, an increase of 15 (2.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
759

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+15

Increase · +2.0%

Change since 2021–22
+35

Increase · +4.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
759
Selected comparison
624.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Manor New Technology MS
School yearStudents enrolledManor New Technology MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 724 First available year 641.9
2022–23 715 Decrease of 9 (1.2%) 647.8
2023–24 713 Decrease of 2 (0.3%) 644.1
2024–25 744 Increase of 31 (4.3%) 639.7
2025–26 759 Increase of 15 (2.0%) 624.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
152

20.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
307

41.15 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
746

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
20.4%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 rated schools reporting

+7.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
41.15
Selected comparison
30.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,651 rated schools reporting

+10.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Manor New Technology MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 754 13 1.7% 14 1.86 9.8% 19.5
2021–22 727 142 19.5% 231 31.77 12.9% 30.3
2022–23 722 150 20.8% 398 55.12 13.4% 32.1
2023–24 725 109 15.0% 172 23.72 13.2% 31.8
2024–25 746 152 20.4% 307 41.15 12.9% 30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Manor New Technology MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 152 20.4% 307 41.15 12.9% 30.3
In-school suspensions 101 13.5% 174 23.32 11.5% 23
Out-of-school suspensions 90 12.1% 128 17.16 7.2% 10.7
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$19k$32k20182020202220242025
  • Manor New Technology MS
  • Parent district: Manor ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,552
Selected comparison
$12,728

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

−$3,176 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,552 per student for this campus, $21,348 per student for its parent district, Manor ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearManor New Technology MSParent district: Manor ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,424$18,546$13,054$7,951 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 rated schools reporting
2019$6,628$16,741$13,108$8,116 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 rated schools reporting
2020$5,889$16,637$14,058$8,695 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting
2021$6,194$16,375$14,797$9,164 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 rated schools reporting
2022$6,692$17,513$15,708$10,497 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting
2023$7,477$30,305$16,792$11,200 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting
2024$7,713$25,746$18,125$12,094 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2025$9,552$21,348$18,972$12,728 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,250+$2,842 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−5.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20.3+6.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Manor New Technology MS

Beginning: 1.9%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 33.6%11 to 20 years: 29.6%21 to 30 years: 10.7%
  • Beginning 1.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 33.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.4%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.8%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Manor New Technology MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classManor New Technology MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 617.817.7
Secondary English14.615
Secondary languages other than English19.517.6
Secondary math15.515.9
Secondary science17.917.3
Secondary social studies20.717.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227907043.