Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Malone ElemF44vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Malone Elem
Hill County · Region 12: Waco · 64 students
Current score
44/1002025-26
Change
−27 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−33.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,222 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2,220 of 2,222tied with 2 others
Score vs region
−34.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
Region 12: Waco placement
301 of 301among reporting schools
Score vs county
−35.8 ptsvs 79.8 average · 21 rated schools in Hill County
Hill County placement
21 of 21among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
−38.9 ptsvs 82.9 average · 163 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
163 of 163among reporting schools
Score vs state
−37.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
7,642 of 7,646tied with 3 others
F44
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 69 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.5 average for 2,222 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is below the 79.8 average for 21 rated schools in Hill County.The current score is below the 82.9 average for 163 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0%−21 pts vs 21%
0% is 21 percentage points lower than
the 21% average among 2,124 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st-lowest of 2,124 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 5 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Malone Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 44 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.5 average for 2,222 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 27 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,220th of 2,222 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
Malone Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 44 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is down 27 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 301st of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.
Malone Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 44 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.8 average for 21 rated schools in Hill County. It is down 27 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 21st of 21 rated schools in Hill County.
Malone Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 44 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.9 average for 163 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 27 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 163rd of 163 similarly sized rated schools.
Malone Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 44 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 27 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 rated schools reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
7.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 rated schools reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 69 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement50 F−22.0 vs similar economic context · 2,051 reporting
School Progress50 F−28.7 vs similar economic context · 2,044 reporting
Closing the Gaps30 F−44.6 vs similar economic context · 2,030 reporting
Academic Growth48 F−24.2 vs similar economic context · 1,998 reporting
Relative Performance50 F−27.0 vs similar economic context · 2,044 reporting
Malone Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,222 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
50
F
10
School Progress
50
F
10
Closing the Gaps
30
F
30
Academic Growth
48
F
12
Relative Performance
50
F
10
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 10 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level53%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,051 reporting
Meets grade level13%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,051 reporting
Masters grade level3%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,051 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level68%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 reporting
Meets grade level14%−32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 reporting
Masters grade level4%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level43%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,039 reporting
Meets grade level11%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,039 reporting
Masters grade level4%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,039 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level43%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Meets grade level14%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,222 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
64
Economically disadvantaged
81.3%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
28.1%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
29.7%+11.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−21.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Malone Elem
African American 3.1%
Hispanic 65.6%
White 29.7%
Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting for every category shown · 2,222 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 69%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Hill County · 21 reporting for every category shown · 21 in full cohort
African American 5.3%
Hispanic 38.8%
White 51.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 163 reporting for every category shown · 163 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 37%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
64
Economically disadvantaged students
52
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
19
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
8
Students in TEA mobility denominator
47
TEA-published mobility rate
17%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 64 students in 2025–26, an increase of 1 (1.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
64
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+1
Increase · +1.6%
Change since 2021–22
−89
Decrease · −58.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
64
Selected comparison
624.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,193 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Malone Elem
School year
Students enrolledMalone Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
153
First available year
653
2022–23
128
Decrease of 25 (16.3%)
654.1
2023–24
91
Decrease of 37 (28.9%)
647.5
2024–25
63
Decrease of 28 (30.8%)
644.1
2025–26
64
Increase of 1 (1.6%)
624.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
68
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Malone Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
175
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
173
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
141
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
108
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
68
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Malone Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Malone Elem
Parent district: Malone ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$31,694
Selected comparison
$13,150
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 rated schools reporting
+$18,544 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $31,694 per student for this campus, $40,595 per student for its parent district, Malone ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Malone Elem
Parent district: Malone ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,922
$11,522
$13,054
$8,198
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,341
$12,756
$13,108
$8,301
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,110 rated schools reporting
2020
$10,274
$12,617
$14,058
$8,801
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,125 rated schools reporting
2021
$11,170
$15,660
$14,797
$9,470
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,135 rated schools reporting
2022
$15,881
$18,514
$15,708
$10,890
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,153 rated schools reporting
2023
$15,793
$18,017
$16,792
$11,441
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,173 rated schools reporting
2024
$22,827
$27,046
$18,125
$12,427
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,190 rated schools reporting
2025
$31,694
$40,595
$18,972
$13,150
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,561+$4,275 vs similar economic context
Teachers
8−35.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.6−5.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Malone Elem
Beginning 12%
1 to 5 years 12%
6 to 10 years 12%
11 to 20 years 37.3%
21 to 30 years 22.7%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting for every category shown · 2,222 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Hill County · 21 reporting for every category shown · 21 in full cohort
Beginning 8.5%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 16.8%
11 to 20 years 27.7%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 163 reporting for every category shown · 163 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 21.7%
6 to 10 years 15.1%
11 to 20 years 25.1%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Malone Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMalone Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
8
18
Grade 1
6
18.4
Grade 2
4
18.4
Grade 3
8
18.9
Grade 4
8
18.9
Grade 5
6
20
Grade 6
6.1
17.6
Secondary English
3.5
15.3
Secondary math
3.5
16.5
Secondary science
4
17.7
Secondary social studies
4
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 7,358
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · full ranking
1of 21
Per-student spending
Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
7of 21
Attendance
Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 109908101.