Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

MacArthur HS

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 2,243 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+21 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
418 of 2,055tied with 57 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 8 points

79 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 8.2 points above the 78.8 average among 2,055 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 19 points

56 to 75 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 75 is 2.1 points above the 72.9 average among 1,854 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

87 +11 pts vs 76

  • 87 is 11 points above the 76 average among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

MacArthur HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 21 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 418th of 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 57 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMacArthur HS 6676727987 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8778.8 2,055 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7978.4 2,038 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7276.4 2,025 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7676.8 2,000 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6681.9 1,982 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement82 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • MacArthur HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement82B8
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 882 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 882 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 882 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
93.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
94.6%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
93.3%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
2.2%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 417 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+11.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria98.0%86.7%+11.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course93.5%59.6%+33.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA18.9%26.6%−7.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)30.7%11.5%+19.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course17.0%32.9%−15.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification30.7%36.8%−6.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.2%2.3%−2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.7%−7.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.4%−4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness3.0%3.3%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.7%8.2%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.0%2.9%−0.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
585

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
214

36.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
184

31.5% of graduates

Not trackable
187

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
585
Selected comparison
249.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
214
Selected comparison
107.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
36.6%
Selected comparison
43.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

−6.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
31.5%
Selected comparison
51.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

−19.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
32.0%
Selected comparison
5.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

+26.2 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. DALLAS COLLEGE DISTRICT (009331)111
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON (003656)38
  3. TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY (003646)10

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
2,243
Economically disadvantaged
72.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
44.9%+22.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.1%−9.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
25.4%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

MacArthur HS

African American: 19%Hispanic: 66%White: 7.6%American Indian: 1.6%Asian: 3.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2.1%
  • African American 19%
  • Hispanic 66%
  • White 7.6%
  • American Indian 1.6%
  • Asian 3.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

African American: 12.7%Hispanic: 59.6%White: 22.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.7%
  • Hispanic 59.6%
  • White 22.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,243
Economically disadvantaged students
1,629
Emergent bilingual students
1,007
Special education students
203

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
526
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,790
TEA-published mobility rate
18.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 2,243 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 241 (9.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
2,243

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−241

Decrease · −9.7%

Change since 2021–22
−481

Decrease · −17.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
2,243
Selected comparison
636.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for MacArthur HS
School yearStudents enrolledMacArthur HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 2,724 First available year 653.4
2022–23 2,586 Decrease of 138 (5.1%) 658.3
2023–24 2,596 Increase of 10 (0.4%) 656.3
2024–25 2,484 Decrease of 112 (4.3%) 652.8
2025–26 2,243 Decrease of 241 (9.7%) 636.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
529

19.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
1,632

59.32 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,751

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
19.2%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,558 rated schools reporting

+5.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
59.32
Selected comparison
31.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 rated schools reporting

+27.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for MacArthur HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,840 136 4.8% 289 10.18 9.3% 18.6
2021–22 2,927 460 15.7% 1,271 43.42 13.0% 31
2022–23 2,834 657 23.2% 1,998 70.50 13.6% 33.3
2023–24 2,835 645 22.8% 2,005 70.72 13.5% 32.9
2024–25 2,751 529 19.2% 1,632 59.32 13.3% 31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for MacArthur HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 529 19.2% 1,632 59.32 13.3% 31.8
In-school suspensions 498 18.1% 1,127 40.97 11.8% 23.9
Out-of-school suspensions 205 7.5% 291 10.58 7.7% 11.6
DAEP placements 128 4.7% 161 5.85 5.3% 6.4
Mandatory DAEP placements 120 4.4% 147 5.34 3.7% 4.3
Discretionary DAEP placements 14 0.5% 14 0.51 3.1% 3.6
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • MacArthur HS
  • Parent district: Irving ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,153
Selected comparison
$13,182

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

−$4,029 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,153 per student for this campus, $19,291 per student for its parent district, Irving ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMacArthur HSParent district: Irving ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,499$11,547$13,054$8,042 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2019$7,626$12,568$13,108$8,198 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2020$8,143$12,056$14,058$8,741 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2021$7,892$13,237$14,797$9,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2022$7,924$14,053$15,708$10,559 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2023$8,440$14,704$16,792$11,268 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2024$8,390$16,256$18,125$12,362 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
2025$9,153$19,291$18,972$13,182 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,120+$2,579 vs similar economic context
Teachers
141+97.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9+1.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

MacArthur HS

Beginning: 8.8%1 to 5 years: 23%6 to 10 years: 16.1%11 to 20 years: 37.7%21 to 30 years: 10.8%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 8.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 23%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 37.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for MacArthur HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMacArthur HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English21.415.3
Secondary languages other than English23.718
Secondary math24.116.2
Secondary science27.517.6
Secondary social studies24.617.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 10of 460

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Similar size · of the 460 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057912003.