+3.5 ptsvs 86.5 average · 1,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
410 of 1,115tied with 71 others
Score vs region
+7.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
280 of 1,157tied with 56 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
108 of 563tied with 23 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,761 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
834 of 4,761tied with 195 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.5 average for 1,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
74%vs 62.5% avg · +11.5 pts
Masters
42%vs 30.5% avg · +11.5 pts
Among 1,090 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Luna Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.5 average for 1,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 410th of 1,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).
Luna Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 280th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 56 others).
Luna Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 108th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 23 others).
Luna Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 834th of 4,761 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 195 others).
Luna Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,090 reporting
School Progress89 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,087 reporting
Closing the Gaps86 B+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,079 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,070 reporting
Relative Performance89 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 1,087 reporting
Luna Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,115 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
86
B
4
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
89
B
1
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,090 reporting
Meets grade level74%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,090 reporting
Masters grade level42%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,090 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 reporting
Meets grade level86%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 reporting
Masters grade level55%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,086 reporting
Meets grade level70%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,086 reporting
Masters grade level34%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,086 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,001 reporting
Meets grade level47%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,001 reporting
Masters grade level24%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,001 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,115 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
536
Economically disadvantaged
33.2%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
21.5%+11.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.2%−3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.8%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Luna Elem
African American 15.7%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 27.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 22.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,115 reporting for every category shown · 1,115 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 31.3%
White 47.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
536
Economically disadvantaged students
178
Emergent bilingual students
115
Special education students
76
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
21
Students in TEA mobility denominator
372
TEA-published mobility rate
5.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 536 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (1.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
536
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−8
Decrease · −1.5%
Change since 2021–22
+68
Increase · +14.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
536
Selected comparison
767.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,095 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Luna Elem
School year
Students enrolledLuna Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
468
First available year
778.4
2022–23
511
Increase of 43 (9.2%)
780.2
2023–24
533
Increase of 22 (4.3%)
777.7
2024–25
544
Increase of 11 (2.1%)
773.8
2025–26
536
Decrease of 8 (1.5%)
767.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14
2.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
19
3.38 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
562
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.5%
Selected comparison
9.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 846 rated schools reporting
−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.38
Selected comparison
19.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 928 rated schools reporting
−16.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Luna Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
439
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
509
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
542
Suppressed
—
14
2.58
—
21.3
2023–24
552
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
562
14
2.5%
19
3.38
9.5%
19.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Luna Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
14
2.5%
19
3.38
9.5%
19.9
In-school suspensions
13
2.3%
16
2.85
8.6%
15.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Luna Elem
Parent district: Garland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,996
Selected comparison
$11,844
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,092 rated schools reporting
−$2,848 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,996 per student for this campus, $18,172 per student for its parent district, Garland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Luna Elem
Parent district: Garland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$14,649
$13,522
$13,054
$7,629
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 990 rated schools reporting
2019
$10,662
$11,776
$13,108
$7,745
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,005 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,484
$11,425
$14,058
$8,096
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,013 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,110
$12,273
$14,797
$8,531
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,025 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,841
$12,983
$15,708
$9,792
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,631
$14,377
$16,792
$10,312
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,064 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,058
$17,363
$18,125
$11,392
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,076 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,996
$18,172
$18,972
$11,844
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,092 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,985+$2,912 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−18.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8+2.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Luna Elem
Beginning 3.1%
1 to 5 years 21.6%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 37.6%
21 to 30 years 12.5%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,115 reporting for every category shown · 1,115 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.6%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Luna Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLuna Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20.9
18.5
Grade 1
19
19.1
Grade 2
21.5
19.5
Grade 3
22
20.1
Grade 4
20.1
19.8
Grade 5
22
21.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
31of 552
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure
36of 1,089
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,089 that report this measure · tied with 4
38of 1,089
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,089 that report this measure · tied with 8
60of 1,089
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,089 that report this measure · tied with 11
200of 4,643
Attendance
Similar size · of the 4,643 that report this measure · tied with 48
243of 4,557
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,557 that report this measure · tied with 58
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057909139.