Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lowe Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 718 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−16 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−12.2 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,828 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,650 of 1,828tied with 48 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.2 average for 1,828 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

10% −5.1 pts vs 15.1%

  • 10% is 5.1 percentage points lower than the 15.1% average among 1,772 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

95.8% +1.4 pts vs 94.4%

  • 95.8% is 1.4 percentage points above the 94.4% average among 1,772 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lowe Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.2 average for 1,828 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 16 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,650th of 1,828 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLowe Elem 8571798769 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6981.2 1,828 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8781.4 1,803 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7979.3 1,776 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7180.0 1,746 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8582.8 1,721 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C−7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,759 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,752 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps60 D−18.4 vs similar economic context · 1,736 reporting
  • Academic Growth63 D−11.9 vs similar economic context · 1,707 reporting
  • Relative Performance70 C−9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,752 reporting
  • Lowe Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,828 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps60D10
Academic Growth63D7
Relative Performance70C10

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (73), so School Progress (70) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 73.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,828 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
718
Economically disadvantaged
55.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.7%+12.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.2%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.0%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Lowe Elem

African American: 26.2%Hispanic: 34.7%White: 21.6%American Indian: 1%Asian: 10.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 26.2%
  • Hispanic 34.7%
  • White 21.6%
  • American Indian 1%
  • Asian 10.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting for every category shown · 1,828 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 44.3%White: 38.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 44.3%
  • White 38.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
718
Economically disadvantaged students
395
Emergent bilingual students
192
Special education students
109

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
85
Students in TEA mobility denominator
606
TEA-published mobility rate
14%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 718 students in 2025–26, an increase of 43 (6.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
718

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+43

Increase · +6.4%

Change since 2021–22
+63

Increase · +9.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
718
Selected comparison
633.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,789 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Lowe Elem
School yearStudents enrolledLowe ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 655 First available year 635.9
2022–23 676 Increase of 21 (3.2%) 642.3
2023–24 706 Increase of 30 (4.4%) 641.2
2024–25 675 Decrease of 31 (4.4%) 638.2
2025–26 718 Increase of 43 (6.4%) 633.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
721

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lowe Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 560 22 3.9% 39 6.96 9.8% 19
2021–22 719 42 5.8% 68 9.46 12.4% 28.1
2022–23 726 74 10.2% 190 26.17 12.9% 29.7
2023–24 784 116 14.8% 473 60.33 12.8% 29.7
2024–25 721 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lowe Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$18k$30k2020202220242025
  • Lowe Elem
  • Parent district: Princeton ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,505
Selected comparison
$12,264

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 rated schools reporting

−$3,759 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,505 per student for this campus, $28,258 per student for its parent district, Princeton ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLowe ElemParent district: Princeton ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2020$8,425$15,933$14,058$8,649 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,692 rated schools reporting
2021$8,103$12,150$14,797$9,029 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,708 rated schools reporting
2022$7,072$20,864$15,708$10,391 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 rated schools reporting
2023$7,549$21,109$16,792$10,888 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 rated schools reporting
2024$8,335$24,063$18,125$11,733 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 rated schools reporting
2025$8,505$28,258$18,972$12,264 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,383−$178 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45+2.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.1−3.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lowe Elem

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 26.8%6 to 10 years: 26.8%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 11.2%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 26.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting for every category shown · 1,828 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lowe Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLowe Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.818
Grade 12018.3
Grade 220.718.4
Grade 318.518.8
Grade 420.219
Grade 520.419.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043911106.