Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Longs Creek Elem

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 553 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−4.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,656 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,127 of 1,656tied with 53 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,656 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
60%vs 58.8% avg · +1.2 pts
Masters
31%vs 25.3% avg · +5.7 pts

Among 1,600 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

13.1% −1 pts vs 14.1%

  • 13.1% is 1 percentage points lower than the 14.1% average among 1,610 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Longs Creek Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,656 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,127th of 1,656 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 53 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLongs Creek Elem 8179769278 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7882.2 1,656 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9282.6 1,629 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7680.5 1,603 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7981.1 1,584 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8183.6 1,562 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement79 C−3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,602 reporting
  • School Progress79 C−2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,597 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C−3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,583 reporting
  • Academic Growth73 C−3.0 vs similar economic context · 1,568 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,597 reporting
  • Longs Creek Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,656 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement79C1
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth73C7
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,602 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,602 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,602 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,594 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,594 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,594 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,656 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
553
Economically disadvantaged
48.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.4%−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.5%+6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Longs Creek Elem

African American: 5.3%Hispanic: 63.5%White: 24.1%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 5.3%
  • African American 5.3%
  • Hispanic 63.5%
  • White 24.1%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 5.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 reporting for every category shown · 1,656 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 40%White: 42.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 40%
  • White 42.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
548
Economically disadvantaged students
267
Emergent bilingual students
35
Special education students
140

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
38
Students in TEA mobility denominator
443
TEA-published mobility rate
8.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 553 students in 2025–26, an increase of 12 (2.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
553

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+12

Increase · +2.2%

Change since 2021–22
−65

Decrease · −10.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
553
Selected comparison
656

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Longs Creek Elem
School yearStudents enrolledLongs Creek ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 618 First available year 656
2022–23 591 Decrease of 27 (4.4%) 661.5
2023–24 572 Decrease of 19 (3.2%) 660.9
2024–25 541 Decrease of 31 (5.4%) 657.5
2025–26 553 Increase of 12 (2.2%) 656

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
571

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Longs Creek Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 646 15 2.3% 42 6.50 9.5% 17.9
2021–22 664 23 3.5% 79 11.90 11.7% 25.6
2022–23 612 23 3.8% 91 14.87 12.2% 27.4
2023–24 600 29 4.8% 70 11.67 12.2% 27.8
2024–25 571 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Longs Creek Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Longs Creek Elem
  • Parent district: North East ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,098
Selected comparison
$12,061

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 rated schools reporting

−$1,963 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,098 per student for this campus, $14,654 per student for its parent district, North East ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLongs Creek ElemParent district: North East ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,547$13,083$13,054$7,838 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,505 rated schools reporting
2019$7,298$14,039$13,108$8,025 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 rated schools reporting
2020$7,578$13,031$14,058$8,522 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting
2021$8,018$12,752$14,797$8,920 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,554 rated schools reporting
2022$8,327$13,646$15,708$10,246 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,564 rated schools reporting
2023$9,056$13,795$16,792$10,747 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,583 rated schools reporting
2024$9,914$16,269$18,125$11,614 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 rated schools reporting
2025$10,098$14,654$18,972$12,061 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,870−$2,136 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42−0.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13−7.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Longs Creek Elem

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 14.3%6 to 10 years: 21.9%11 to 20 years: 29.2%21 to 30 years: 27.3%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 27.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 reporting for every category shown · 1,656 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.7%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Longs Creek Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLongs Creek Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten14.217.9
Grade 118.318.4
Grade 221.818.6
Grade 320.819.1
Grade 416.419.1
Grade 524.320

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015910134.