Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Leyendecker ElemA94vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Leyendecker Elem
Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 376 students
Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+16.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
23 of 1,200tied with 6 others
Score vs region
+8.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
34 of 505tied with 15 others
Score vs county
+5.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
10 of 76tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 3,724 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
175 of 3,724tied with 64 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 3,724 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
89%vs 39.3% avg · +49.7 pts
Masters
50%vs 15.2% avg · +34.8 pts
Among 1,111 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 1,111 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 3 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Leyendecker Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 23rd of 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).
Leyendecker Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 34th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 15 others).
Leyendecker Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 76 rated schools in Webb County (tied with 2 others).
Leyendecker Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 3,724 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 175th of 3,724 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 64 others).
Leyendecker Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+24.2 vs similar economic context · 1,112 reporting
School Progress94 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,111 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+17.7 vs similar economic context · 1,104 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+18.3 vs similar economic context · 1,096 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+17.4 vs similar economic context · 1,110 reporting
Leyendecker Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,200 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
94
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level95%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,112 reporting
Meets grade level82%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,112 reporting
Masters grade level46%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,112 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,112 reporting
Meets grade level71%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,112 reporting
Masters grade level41%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,112 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,111 reporting
Meets grade level89%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,111 reporting
Masters grade level50%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,111 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Meets grade level93%+60 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Masters grade level51%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,200 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
376
Economically disadvantaged
100.0%+5.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
52.3%+7.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.3%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.1%−13.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Leyendecker Elem
Hispanic 99.7%
White 0.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 reporting for every category shown · 1,200 in full cohort
African American 15.5%
Hispanic 77.8%
White 4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,724 reporting for every category shown · 3,724 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 27.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
375
Economically disadvantaged students
375
Emergent bilingual students
196
Special education students
65
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
39
Students in TEA mobility denominator
321
TEA-published mobility rate
12.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 376 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 30 (7.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
376
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−30
Decrease · −7.4%
Change since 2021–22
−20
Decrease · −5.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
376
Selected comparison
539.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Leyendecker Elem
School year
Students enrolledLeyendecker Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
396
First available year
592.1
2022–23
442
Increase of 46 (11.6%)
585.3
2023–24
424
Decrease of 18 (4.1%)
575.7
2024–25
406
Decrease of 18 (4.2%)
568.8
2025–26
376
Decrease of 30 (7.4%)
539.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
441
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Leyendecker Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
445
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
459
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
473
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
457
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
441
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Leyendecker Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Leyendecker Elem
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,840
Selected comparison
$13,706
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 rated schools reporting
−$866 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,840 per student for this campus, $17,272 per student for its parent district, Laredo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Leyendecker Elem
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,978
$12,618
$13,054
$8,427
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,133 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,967
$12,937
$13,108
$8,365
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,147 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,144
$13,776
$14,058
$8,876
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,150 rated schools reporting
2021
$11,429
$15,445
$14,797
$9,811
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,150 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,796
$19,935
$15,708
$11,209
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,015
$18,022
$16,792
$11,893
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,172 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,805
$18,312
$18,125
$13,008
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 rated schools reporting
2025
$12,840
$17,272
$18,972
$13,706
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,890−$1,954 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−9.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−1.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Leyendecker Elem
1 to 5 years 13.8%
6 to 10 years 17.2%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 20.7%
Over 30 years 20.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 reporting for every category shown · 1,200 in full cohort
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 26.8%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,724 reporting for every category shown · 3,724 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Leyendecker Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLeyendecker Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21
18.2
Grade 1
21.3
18.2
Grade 2
17.3
18.1
Grade 3
16
18.1
Grade 4
18.2
18.1
Grade 5
15.9
18.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 1,058
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,058 that report this measure · tied with 12
1of 76
Math — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 76
Math — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
11 measures
5of 76
All Subjects — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 76
Math — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
6of 76
All Subjects — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
6of 76
Science — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
7of 76
Academic Growth
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 76
Per-student spending
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
9of 1,112
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,112 that report this measure
9of 1,112
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,112 that report this measure · tied with 3
9of 76
Science — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 76
Attendance
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 76
Overall score
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
15of 1,112
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,112 that report this measure · tied with 3
16of 1,112
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,112 that report this measure · tied with 5
16of 1,110
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 6
20of 1,112
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,112 that report this measure · tied with 4
21of 1,104
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,104 that report this measure · tied with 10
23of 1,111
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,111 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240901108.