Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lee Martinez Elem

Williamson County · Region 13: Austin · 588 students

Current score
70/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−14.4 ptsvs 84.4 average · 1,338 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,274 of 1,338tied with 12 others
C70

At a glance

The current score is below the 84.4 average for 1,338 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lee Martinez Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.4 average for 1,338 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,274th of 1,338 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 12 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 70 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7084.4 1,338 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C−11.9 vs similar economic context · 1,299 reporting
  • School Progress68 D−14.6 vs similar economic context · 1,295 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps64 D−17.7 vs similar economic context · 1,285 reporting
  • Academic Growth68 D−9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,273 reporting
  • Relative Performance59 F−20.5 vs similar economic context · 1,295 reporting
  • Lee Martinez Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,338 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress68D2
Closing the Gaps64D6
Academic Growth68D2
Relative Performance59F1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (73), so School Progress (68) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 73.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,299 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,299 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,299 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,298 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,298 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,298 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,293 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,293 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,293 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,198 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,198 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,198 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,338 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
588
Economically disadvantaged
39.6%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.7%+12.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.2%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Lee Martinez Elem

African American: 10%Hispanic: 48.8%White: 28.4%American Indian: 0.9%Asian: 4.2%Two or More Races: 7.8%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 48.8%
  • White 28.4%
  • American Indian 0.9%
  • Asian 4.2%
  • Two or More Races 7.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,338 reporting for every category shown · 1,338 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 35.2%White: 46.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 35.2%
  • White 46.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
578
Economically disadvantaged students
229
Emergent bilingual students
137
Special education students
111

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$63,810−$3,595 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42−4.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.7−0.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lee Martinez Elem

Beginning: 9.5%1 to 5 years: 29.9%6 to 10 years: 39.9%11 to 20 years: 13.5%21 to 30 years: 7.1%
  • Beginning 9.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 29.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 39.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 13.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,338 reporting for every category shown · 1,338 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.1%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246906109.