+4.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 462 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
18 of 462tied with 25 others
Score vs region
+16.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
7 of 519tied with 6 others
Score vs county
+12.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 164 rated schools in Williamson County
Williamson County placement
3 of 164tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+15.0 ptsvs 81 average · 3,508 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
32 of 3,508tied with 26 others
Score vs state
+14.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
146 of 7,646tied with 100 others
A96
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.6 average for 462 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County.The current score is above the 81 average for 3,508 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
88%vs 76.2% avg · +11.8 pts
Masters
65%vs 46.7% avg · +18.3 pts
Among 454 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Laurel Mountain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.6 average for 462 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 462 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).
Laurel Mountain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 6 others).
Laurel Mountain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 164 rated schools in Williamson County (tied with 5 others).
Laurel Mountain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 3,508 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 32nd of 3,508 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 26 others).
Laurel Mountain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+3.3 vs similar economic context · 454 reporting
School Progress94 A+6.1 vs similar economic context · 452 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+5.8 vs similar economic context · 449 reporting
Academic Growth94 A+7.7 vs similar economic context · 449 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+8.8 vs similar economic context · 452 reporting
Laurel Mountain Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (462 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
94
A
—
Relative Performance
87
B
3
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so
School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 reporting
Meets grade level88%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 reporting
Masters grade level65%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 reporting
Meets grade level88%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 reporting
Masters grade level71%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 reporting
Meets grade level88%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 reporting
Masters grade level61%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
Meets grade level86%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
Masters grade level63%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (462 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
839
Economically disadvantaged
6.9%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.7%+15.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.5%−4.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.5%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Laurel Mountain Elem
African American 1.1%
Hispanic 12.5%
White 29.2%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 45.8%
Two or More Races 11.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 462 reporting for every category shown · 462 in full cohort
African American 4.9%
Hispanic 17.5%
White 48.6%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 22.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
African American 7.1%
Hispanic 37%
White 35.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 13.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,508 reporting for every category shown · 3,508 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
839
Economically disadvantaged students
58
Emergent bilingual students
216
Special education students
88
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
629
TEA-published mobility rate
4.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 839 students in 2025–26, an increase of 17 (2.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
839
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+17
Increase · +2.1%
Change since 2021–22
+293
Increase · +53.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
839
Selected comparison
875.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Laurel Mountain Elem
School year
Students enrolledLaurel Mountain Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
546
First available year
884
2022–23
702
Increase of 156 (28.6%)
904.4
2023–24
811
Increase of 109 (15.5%)
893.2
2024–25
822
Increase of 11 (1.4%)
886.1
2025–26
839
Increase of 17 (2.1%)
875.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
851
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Laurel Mountain Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
745
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
683
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
770
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
867
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
851
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Laurel Mountain Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Laurel Mountain Elem
Parent district: Round Rock ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,175
Selected comparison
$10,755
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
−$2,580 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,175 per student for this campus, $16,516 per student for its parent district, Round Rock ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Laurel Mountain Elem
Parent district: Round Rock ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,212
$12,357
$13,054
$7,219
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,750
$11,300
$13,108
$7,329
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,021
$12,713
$14,058
$7,639
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,676
$15,241
$14,797
$8,245
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,182
$15,983
$15,708
$9,452
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 423 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,831
$14,746
$16,792
$9,494
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,876
$15,268
$18,125
$10,146
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 442 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,175
$16,516
$18,972
$10,755
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,014−$5,450 vs similar economic context
Teachers
55−1.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.3+0.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Laurel Mountain Elem
Beginning 8.2%
1 to 5 years 31.9%
6 to 10 years 25.5%
11 to 20 years 19.2%
21 to 30 years 15%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 462 reporting for every category shown · 462 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 31.7%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,508 reporting for every category shown · 3,508 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Laurel Mountain Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLaurel Mountain Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.2
18.9
Grade 1
20.8
19.2
Grade 2
18.5
19.6
Grade 3
23
21.5
Grade 4
20.5
20.4
Grade 5
23.1
22.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
13 measures
4of 162
Reading — Masters
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
5of 162
All Subjects — Meets
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 161
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Williamson County · of the 161 that report this measure
5of 159
Academic Growth
Williamson County · of the 159 that report this measure · tied with 3
6of 162
Math — Meets
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
6of 162
Math — Masters
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 519
Overall score
Region 13: Austin · of the 519 that report this measure · tied with 6
7of 162
All Subjects — Masters
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
8of 506
Student Achievement
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure · tied with 7
8of 162
Reading — Meets
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 162
Math — Approaches
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 161
Attendance
Williamson County · of the 161 that report this measure · tied with 3
10of 499
Closing the Gaps
Region 13: Austin · of the 499 that report this measure · tied with 9
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
15of 504
School Progress
Region 13: Austin · of the 504 that report this measure · tied with 8
22of 506
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure · tied with 8
22of 494
Science — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 494 that report this measure
80of 3,206
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 3,206 that report this measure · tied with 13
162of 3,434
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 3,434 that report this measure · tied with 66
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246909116.