Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Laura Welch Bush ElemA94vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Laura Welch Bush Elem
Williamson County · Region 13: Austin · 502 students
Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 411 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
83 of 411tied with 53 others
Score vs region
+14.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
29 of 519tied with 16 others
Score vs county
+10.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 164 rated schools in Williamson County
Williamson County placement
16 of 164tied with 7 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,710 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
191 of 4,710tied with 74 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.6 average for 411 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,710 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
82%vs 76.4% avg · +5.6 pts
Masters
55%vs 47.2% avg · +7.8 pts
Among 403 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Laura Welch Bush Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.6 average for 411 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 83rd of 411 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 53 others).
Laura Welch Bush Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 16 others).
Laura Welch Bush Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 164 rated schools in Williamson County (tied with 7 others).
Laura Welch Bush Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,710 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 191st of 4,710 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 74 others).
Laura Welch Bush Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+1.3 vs similar economic context · 403 reporting
School Progress92 A+4.0 vs similar economic context · 401 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+4.6 vs similar economic context · 398 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+5.4 vs similar economic context · 398 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 401 reporting
Laura Welch Bush Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (411 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
82
B
8
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Meets grade level82%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Masters grade level55%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Meets grade level85%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Masters grade level58%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
Meets grade level84%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
Masters grade level57%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 372 reporting
Meets grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 372 reporting
Masters grade level44%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 372 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (411 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
502
Economically disadvantaged
5.6%−3.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.5%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.3%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.8%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Laura Welch Bush Elem
African American 1.2%
Hispanic 18.1%
White 52.8%
American Indian 1%
Asian 19.7%
Two or More Races 7.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 reporting for every category shown · 411 in full cohort
African American 4.7%
Hispanic 16.9%
White 47.9%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 24.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
African American 7.1%
Hispanic 37%
White 35.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 13.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,710 reporting for every category shown · 4,710 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55%
White 24.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
502
Economically disadvantaged students
28
Emergent bilingual students
93
Special education students
67
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
400
TEA-published mobility rate
4.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 502 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 1 (0.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
502
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−1
Decrease · −0.2%
Change since 2021–22
−62
Decrease · −11.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
502
Selected comparison
868.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Laura Welch Bush Elem
School year
Students enrolledLaura Welch Bush Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
564
First available year
877.4
2022–23
525
Decrease of 39 (6.9%)
899.1
2023–24
503
Decrease of 22 (4.2%)
887.2
2024–25
503
No change
880.2
2025–26
502
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
868.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
13
2.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
15
2.87 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
523
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.5%
Selected comparison
4.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 226 rated schools reporting
−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.87
Selected comparison
7.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 270 rated schools reporting
−4.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Laura Welch Bush Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
575
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
599
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
554
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
518
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
523
13
2.5%
15
2.87
4.6%
7.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Laura Welch Bush Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
13
2.5%
15
2.87
4.6%
7.5
In-school suspensions
13
2.5%
15
2.87
4.3%
6.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Laura Welch Bush Elem
Parent district: Leander ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,239
Selected comparison
$10,881
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
−$1,642 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,239 per student for this campus, $20,543 per student for its parent district, Leander ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Laura Welch Bush Elem
Parent district: Leander ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,187
$11,627
$13,054
$7,190
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 337 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,124
$15,265
$13,108
$7,345
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,234
$9,781
$14,058
$7,650
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 356 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,775
$14,703
$14,797
$8,272
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 366 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,272
$14,776
$15,708
$9,551
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,470
$14,111
$16,792
$9,494
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,160
$18,103
$18,125
$10,213
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,239
$20,543
$18,972
$10,881
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,060−$2,486 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−17.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.1−1.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Laura Welch Bush Elem
Beginning 2.6%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 15.1%
11 to 20 years 22.7%
21 to 30 years 23.4%
Over 30 years 10.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 reporting for every category shown · 411 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 31.7%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,710 reporting for every category shown · 4,710 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Laura Welch Bush Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLaura Welch Bush Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16
19
Grade 1
16.8
19.2
Grade 2
19.8
19.6
Grade 3
18.1
21.7
Grade 4
20.9
20.4
Grade 5
16.3
22.4
Grade 6
15.3
18.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
7of 162
Reading — Approaches
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 3
9of 162
Math — Meets
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 162
Math — Masters
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
10 measures
20of 506
All Subjects — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure
20of 499
Closing the Gaps
Region 13: Austin · of the 499 that report this measure · tied with 8
22of 506
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure · tied with 8
23of 506
All Subjects — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure · tied with 1
23of 503
Math — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 503 that report this measure · tied with 8
26of 491
Academic Growth
Region 13: Austin · of the 491 that report this measure · tied with 9
123of 4,494
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,494 that report this measure · tied with 13
152of 4,494
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 4,494 that report this measure · tied with 20
185of 4,494
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 4,494 that report this measure · tied with 83
191of 4,710
Overall score
Similar size · of the 4,710 that report this measure · tied with 74
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246913111.