+5.8 ptsvs 88.2 average · 922 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
85 of 922tied with 65 others
Score vs region
+10.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
86 of 1,303tied with 44 others
Score vs county
+10.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
64 of 911tied with 33 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.0 ptsvs 85 average · 995 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
49 of 995tied with 55 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88.2 average for 922 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 85 average for 995 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
82%vs 66.5% avg · +15.5 pts
Masters
62%vs 34.8% avg · +27.2 pts
Among 903 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lanier MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.2 average for 922 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 85th of 922 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).
Lanier MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 86th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 44 others).
Lanier MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 64th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 33 others).
Lanier MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85 average for 995 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 49th of 995 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 55 others).
Lanier MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+6.0 vs similar economic context · 903 reporting
School Progress93 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 901 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+6.2 vs similar economic context · 896 reporting
Academic Growth89 B+7.5 vs similar economic context · 887 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.1 vs similar economic context · 901 reporting
Lanier MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (922 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
89
B
1
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so
School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 reporting
Meets grade level82%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 reporting
Masters grade level62%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 reporting
Meets grade level88%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 reporting
Masters grade level73%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 903 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 901 reporting
Meets grade level75%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 901 reporting
Masters grade level48%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 901 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 826 reporting
Meets grade level87%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 826 reporting
Masters grade level71%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 826 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 reporting
Meets grade level76%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 reporting
Masters grade level61%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (922 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,484
Economically disadvantaged
26.3%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.4%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.5%−9.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.1%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.0%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lanier MS
African American 13.2%
Hispanic 30.7%
White 32.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 16.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 922 reporting for every category shown · 922 in full cohort
African American 8.7%
Hispanic 27.9%
White 48.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 9.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 995 reporting for every category shown · 995 in full cohort
African American 13.1%
Hispanic 51%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,484
Economically disadvantaged students
391
Emergent bilingual students
110
Special education students
111
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
76
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,520
TEA-published mobility rate
5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,484 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 1 (0.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,484
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−1
Decrease · −0.1%
Change since 2021–22
+69
Increase · +4.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,484
Selected comparison
827.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 915 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Lanier MS
School year
Students enrolledLanier MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,415
First available year
842.8
2022–23
1,434
Increase of 19 (1.3%)
847.2
2023–24
1,418
Decrease of 16 (1.1%)
841.9
2024–25
1,485
Increase of 67 (4.7%)
837.9
2025–26
1,484
Decrease of 1 (0.1%)
827.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
161
10.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
259
17.13 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,512
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
10.7%
Selected comparison
8.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 667 rated schools reporting
+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
17.13
Selected comparison
15.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 755 rated schools reporting
+1.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lanier MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,450
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
1,460
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
1,489
83
5.6%
119
7.99
8.8%
17.6
2023–24
1,461
110
7.5%
179
12.25
8.2%
16.8
2024–25
1,512
161
10.7%
259
17.13
8.0%
15.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lanier MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
161
10.7%
259
17.13
8.0%
15.9
In-school suspensions
139
9.2%
193
12.76
7.2%
12.5
Out-of-school suspensions
46
3.0%
63
4.17
3.9%
5.3
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Lanier MS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,192
Selected comparison
$11,366
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 rated schools reporting
−$3,174 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,192 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Lanier MS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,612
$14,470
$13,054
$7,562
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 817 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,196
$13,643
$13,108
$7,645
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,631
$13,627
$14,058
$7,964
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 842 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,331
$13,515
$14,797
$8,424
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 850 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,109
$14,985
$15,708
$9,662
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 867 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,951
$16,350
$16,792
$10,179
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 885 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,433
$18,150
$18,125
$11,335
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 899 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,192
$17,026
$18,972
$11,366
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,777+$3,334 vs similar economic context
Teachers
74+20.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20+5.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lanier MS
Beginning 20.2%
1 to 5 years 20.2%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 24.1%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 922 reporting for every category shown · 922 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 995 reporting for every category shown · 995 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.7%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lanier MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLanier MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
28.7
19.1
Secondary English
25.5
17.1
Secondary languages other than English
33.1
19.3
Secondary math
25.4
17.6
Secondary science
26.7
19.4
Secondary social studies
26.7
19.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
6of 874
Reading — Masters
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 982
Attendance
Similar size · of the 982 that report this measure · tied with 4
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
11 measures
22of 903
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 903 that report this measure · tied with 2
23of 826
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 826 that report this measure · tied with 7
28of 993
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 993 that report this measure · tied with 12
28of 820
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 820 that report this measure · tied with 3
38of 981
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 981 that report this measure · tied with 1
47of 901
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 901 that report this measure · tied with 13
51of 993
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 993 that report this measure · tied with 8
54of 1,242
Student Achievement
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,242 that report this measure · tied with 24
61of 1,134
Science — Meets
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,134 that report this measure · tied with 3
263of 7,254
Reading — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 99
265of 7,227
Math — Masters
Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 32
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912057.