+6.4 ptsvs 81.6 average · 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
419 of 1,759tied with 67 others
Score vs region
+12.6 ptsvs 75.4 average · 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont
Region 05: Beaumont placement
22 of 150tied with 1 other
Score vs county
+16.0 ptsvs 72 average · 53 rated schools in Jefferson County
Jefferson County placement
10 of 53among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+7.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,765 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,205 of 4,765tied with 139 others
Score vs state
+6.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,199 of 7,646tied with 256 others
B88
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.6 average for 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont.The current score is above the 72 average for 53 rated schools in Jefferson County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,765 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 52.1% avg · +10.9 pts
Masters
29%vs 22.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Among 1,693 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Langham Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.6 average for 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 419th of 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Langham Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 22nd of 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont (tied with 1 other).
Langham Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 72 average for 53 rated schools in Jefferson County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 53 rated schools in Jefferson County.
Langham Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,765 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,205th of 4,765 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 139 others).
Langham Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement89 B+8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,693 reporting
School Progress88 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,686 reporting
Closing the Gaps84 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+12.7 vs similar economic context · 1,647 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,686 reporting
Langham Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,759 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
89
B
1
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
84
B
6
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so
School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level86%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Meets grade level63%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Masters grade level29%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
Meets grade level68%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
Masters grade level34%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 reporting
Meets grade level62%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 reporting
Masters grade level27%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Meets grade level48%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Masters grade level20%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,759 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
544
Economically disadvantaged
52.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.2%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.3%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.6%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Langham Elem
African American 4.8%
Hispanic 29.2%
White 54%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting for every category shown · 1,759 in full cohort
African American 9.8%
Hispanic 42.7%
White 40%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
African American 20.1%
Hispanic 22.9%
White 50.9%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Jefferson County · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
African American 37.3%
Hispanic 35.5%
White 20.7%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,765 reporting for every category shown · 4,765 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
544
Economically disadvantaged students
288
Emergent bilingual students
61
Special education students
83
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
30
Students in TEA mobility denominator
457
TEA-published mobility rate
6.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 553 students in 2024–25.
Latest available PEIMS enrollment
553
2024–25
Enrollment in 2024–25
This school
553
Selected comparison
645.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Langham Elem
School year
Students enrolledLangham Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
414
First available year
642.7
2022–23
428
Increase of 14 (3.4%)
648.7
2023–24
Not reported
Not available
—
2024–25
553
No adjacent prior year
645.3
2025–26
Not reported
Not available
—
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
16
2.80 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
571
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.8
Selected comparison
27.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,470 rated schools reporting
−24.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Langham Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
430
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
442
Suppressed
—
29
6.56
—
27.5
2022–23
464
10
2.2%
40
8.62
12.7%
29.2
2023–24
559
25
4.5%
64
11.45
12.6%
29.4
2024–25
571
Suppressed
—
16
2.80
—
27.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Langham Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
16
2.80
—
27.4
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
13
2.28
—
21.2
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Langham Elem
Parent district: Nederland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,744
Selected comparison
$12,184
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 rated schools reporting
−$3,440 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,744 per student for this campus, $14,709 per student for its parent district, Nederland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Langham Elem
Parent district: Nederland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,123
$9,892
$13,054
$7,879
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,604 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,797
$10,236
$13,108
$8,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,042
$13,761
$14,058
$8,594
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,202
$15,909
$14,797
$8,984
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,762
$21,094
$15,708
$10,252
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,662 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,533
$27,159
$16,792
$10,812
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,564
$19,212
$18,125
$11,721
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,744
$14,709
$18,972
$12,184
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,799−$810 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−9.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.6−3.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Langham Elem
1 to 5 years 30.6%
6 to 10 years 16.8%
11 to 20 years 34.6%
21 to 30 years 12.2%
Over 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting for every category shown · 1,759 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
Beginning 8.3%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 25.1%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Jefferson County · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
Beginning 13.7%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 24.5%
21 to 30 years 12.9%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,765 reporting for every category shown · 4,765 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Langham Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLangham Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.2
18
Grade 1
22.5
18.3
Grade 2
19.4
18.5
Grade 3
22.9
18.9
Grade 4
21.8
19
Grade 5
18.9
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
16 measures
4of 47
Academic Growth
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
5of 47
Reading — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 47
Math — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
6of 47
All Subjects — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 47
Reading — Meets
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
6of 47
Math — Meets
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
7of 47
Reading — Masters
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
8of 47
Student Achievement
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 47
School Progress
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
8of 47
Relative Performance
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 47
All Subjects — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
8of 47
All Subjects — Meets
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 47
Math — Approaches
Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure
10of 53
Overall score
Jefferson County · of the 53 that report this measure
10of 51
Attendance
Jefferson County · of the 51 that report this measure
10of 51
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Jefferson County · of the 51 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 123905104.