Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lamont Ramage Elem

Hays County · Region 13: Austin · 701 students

Current score
89/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+9.5 ptsvs 79.5 average · 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
330 of 2,023tied with 67 others
B89

At a glance

The current score is above the 79.5 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
49%vs 41.6% avg · +7.4 pts
Masters
21%vs 15.9% avg · +5.1 pts

Among 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

89 +9.5 pts vs 79.5

  • 89 is 9.5 points above the 79.5 average among 2,023 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

85 +8.2 pts vs 76.8

  • 85 is 8.2 points above the 76.8 average among 1,887 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lamont Ramage Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.5 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 330th of 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 89 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8979.5 2,023 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement74 C−2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+9.5 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps85 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Academic Growth90 A+16.3 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
  • Relative Performance78 C−0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
  • Lamont Ramage Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement74C6
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps85B5
Academic Growth90A—
Relative Performance78C2

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level74%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level46%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
  • Meets grade level17%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
701
Economically disadvantaged
67.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
32.2%+12.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.4%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Lamont Ramage Elem

African American: 5%Hispanic: 78.2%White: 14.2%Asian: 0.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.9%
  • African American 5%
  • Hispanic 78.2%
  • White 14.2%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort

African American: 11.9%Hispanic: 54.2%White: 27.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.6%
  • African American 11.9%
  • Hispanic 54.2%
  • White 27.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
698
Economically disadvantaged students
470
Emergent bilingual students
225
Special education students
170

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$65,525−$1,012 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45+2.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5+1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lamont Ramage Elem

Beginning: 6.6%1 to 5 years: 28.8%6 to 10 years: 28.8%11 to 20 years: 24.3%21 to 30 years: 9.3%Over 30 years: 2.2%
  • Beginning 6.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.6%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.9%21 to 30 years: 15.6%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.6%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 4of 49

    Academic Growth

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure

  • 5of 50

    School Progress

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 105906121.