STAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 49%vs 41.6% avg · +7.4 pts
- Masters
- 21%vs 15.9% avg · +5.1 pts
Among 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureIndependent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Traditional public school campus
Hays County · Region 13: Austin · 701 students
At a glance
The current score is above the 79.5 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 52 rated schools in Hays County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,304 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
STAAR result
Among 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
89 +9.5 pts vs 79.5
Current strength
85 +8.2 pts vs 76.8
Current strength
89 +9.1 pts vs 79.9
Current strength
85 +7.8 pts vs 77.2
Current strength
90 +11.2 pts vs 78.8
Current strength
89 +7.3 pts vs 81.7
Current strength
85 +8 pts vs 77
Current strength
90 +9.6 pts vs 80.4
Current strength
89 +8.4 pts vs 80.6
Current strength
85 +7 pts vs 78
Current strength
90 +9.6 pts vs 80.4
STAAR result
Among 7,227 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
89 +7.7 pts vs 81.3
Current strength
85 +6.3 pts vs 78.7
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Lamont Ramage Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.5 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 330th of 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Lamont Ramage Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 134th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 19 others).
Lamont Ramage Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 52 rated schools in Hays County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 12th of 52 rated schools in Hays County (tied with 4 others).
Lamont Ramage Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,304 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 986th of 4,304 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 155 others).
Lamont Ramage Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 1,913th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 285 others).
Put the numbers in context
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 89 | 79.5 2,023 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 74 | C | 6 |
| School Progress | 90 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 85 | B | 5 |
| Academic Growth | 90 | A | — |
| Relative Performance | 78 | C | 2 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Lamont Ramage Elem
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Hays County · 52 reporting for every category shown · 52 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,304 reporting for every category shown · 4,304 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Lamont Ramage Elem
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Hays County · 52 reporting for every category shown · 52 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,304 reporting for every category shown · 4,304 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
Academic Growth
Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure
School Progress
Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 105906121.