Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lamkin Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 775 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.8 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,141 of 2,055tied with 83 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
47%vs 45.1% avg · +1.9 pts
Masters
22%vs 17.9% avg · +4.1 pts

Among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
44%vs 39.9% avg · +4.1 pts
Masters
20%vs 15% avg · +5 pts

Among 1,907 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 49.9% avg · +1.1 pts
Masters
26%vs 19.5% avg · +6.5 pts

Among 1,915 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lamkin Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,141st of 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 83 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
30.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
4.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLamkin Elem 8080748478 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7878.8 2,055 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8478.4 2,038 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7476.4 2,025 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8076.8 2,000 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8081.9 1,982 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
  • School Progress81 B+1.0 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps71 C−5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • Academic Growth74 C+1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • Lamkin Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps71C9
Academic Growth74C6
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
775
Economically disadvantaged
72.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.3%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.5%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.5%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.6%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Lamkin Elem

African American: 31.1%Hispanic: 37.9%White: 19.3%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 5.4%Two or More Races: 6%
  • African American 31.1%
  • Hispanic 37.9%
  • White 19.3%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 5.4%
  • Two or More Races 6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

African American: 12.7%Hispanic: 59.6%White: 22.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.7%
  • Hispanic 59.6%
  • White 22.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
766
Economically disadvantaged students
556
Emergent bilingual students
102
Special education students
149

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
119
Students in TEA mobility denominator
703
TEA-published mobility rate
16.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 775 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 59 (7.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
775

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−59

Decrease · −7.1%

Change since 2021–22
−125

Decrease · −13.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
775
Selected comparison
636.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Lamkin Elem
School yearStudents enrolledLamkin ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 900 First available year 653.4
2022–23 893 Decrease of 7 (0.8%) 658.3
2023–24 903 Increase of 10 (1.1%) 656.3
2024–25 834 Decrease of 69 (7.6%) 652.8
2025–26 775 Decrease of 59 (7.1%) 636.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
80

9.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
374

42.50 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
880

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.1%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,558 rated schools reporting

−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
42.5
Selected comparison
31.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 rated schools reporting

+10.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lamkin Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 916 24 2.6% 54 5.90 9.3% 18.6
2021–22 957 56 5.8% 141 14.73 13.0% 31
2022–23 973 53 5.5% 166 17.06 13.6% 33.3
2023–24 979 60 6.1% 193 19.71 13.5% 32.9
2024–25 880 80 9.1% 374 42.50 13.3% 31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lamkin Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 80 9.1% 374 42.50 13.3% 31.8
In-school suspensions 79 9.0% 353 40.11 11.8% 23.9
Out-of-school suspensions 10 1.1% 17 1.93 7.7% 11.6
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Lamkin Elem
  • Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,504
Selected comparison
$13,182

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

−$3,678 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,504 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLamkin ElemParent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,386$12,265$13,054$8,042 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2019$6,759$12,730$13,108$8,198 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2020$7,119$12,750$14,058$8,741 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2021$7,594$14,470$14,797$9,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2022$7,704$15,507$15,708$10,559 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2023$8,462$15,990$16,792$11,268 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2024$8,957$16,047$18,125$12,362 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
2025$9,504$16,633$18,972$13,182 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,796+$8,255 vs similar economic context
Teachers
52+8.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8+0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lamkin Elem

1 to 5 years: 25.7%6 to 10 years: 18.4%11 to 20 years: 41.2%21 to 30 years: 8.9%Over 30 years: 6%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 41.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.9%
  • Over 30 years 6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lamkin Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLamkin Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten21.217.9
Grade 121.818.2
Grade 220.718.2
Grade 318.518.6
Grade 420.318.9
Grade 518.819.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907103.