Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lamar HS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 2,790 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
+13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
382 of 1,611tied with 54 others
B89

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.4 average for 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 3 points

87 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 7.6 points above the 82.4 average among 1,561 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
72%vs 53.5% avg · +18.5 pts
Masters
34%vs 25.9% avg · +8.1 pts

Among 1,442 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

89 +6.6 pts vs 82.4

  • 89 is 6.6 points above the 82.4 average among 1,611 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lamar HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 382nd of 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLamar HS 7679848989 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8982.4 1,611 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8982.8 1,583 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8480.7 1,557 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7981.3 1,539 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7683.8 1,518 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,561 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,556 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps88 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,546 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,556 reporting
  • Lamar HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,611 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps88B2
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level84%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Masters grade level48%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,611 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.9%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 431 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
96.6%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 430 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
94.9%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 430 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.3%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%+10.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria99.0%88.6%+10.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course97.6%59.5%+38.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA36.0%30.3%+5.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)44.3%11.0%+33.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course2.5%34.3%−31.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification62.1%38.8%+23.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.4%1.4%−1.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.0%−4.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.8%−4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.5%3.0%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.6%7.4%−0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.2%3.4%−2.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
757

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
321

42.4% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
280

37.0% of graduates

Not trackable
156

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
757
Selected comparison
216.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
321
Selected comparison
94.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
42.4%
Selected comparison
46.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

−3.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
37.0%
Selected comparison
49.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

−12.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
20.6%
Selected comparison
4.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

+16.3 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)94
  2. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)50
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)21

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
2,790
Economically disadvantaged
47.5%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.2%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.4%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.4%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Lamar HS

African American: 31%Hispanic: 41.3%White: 19.3%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 4.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 31%
  • Hispanic 41.3%
  • White 19.3%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 4.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 reporting for every category shown · 1,611 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 39.5%White: 43.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 39.5%
  • White 43.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,780
Economically disadvantaged students
1,320
Emergent bilingual students
368
Special education students
233

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
328
Students in TEA mobility denominator
3,119
TEA-published mobility rate
10.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 2,790 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 178 (6.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
2,790

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−178

Decrease · −6.0%

Change since 2021–22
−153

Decrease · −5.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
2,790
Selected comparison
660.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,573 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Lamar HS
School yearStudents enrolledLamar HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 2,943 First available year 659.3
2022–23 3,125 Increase of 182 (6.2%) 664.5
2023–24 3,078 Decrease of 47 (1.5%) 663.6
2024–25 2,968 Decrease of 110 (3.6%) 660.7
2025–26 2,790 Decrease of 178 (6.0%) 660.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
286

9.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
502

16.33 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
3,075

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.3%
Selected comparison
11.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,257 rated schools reporting

−2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
16.33
Selected comparison
26.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,349 rated schools reporting

−9.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lamar HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,899 13 0.5% 18 0.62 9.5% 18.1
2021–22 3,055 145 4.8% 207 6.78 11.8% 25.8
2022–23 3,236 289 8.9% 439 13.57 12.2% 27.3
2023–24 3,196 253 7.9% 439 13.74 12.2% 27.8
2024–25 3,075 286 9.3% 502 16.33 11.8% 26.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lamar HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 286 9.3% 502 16.33 11.8% 26.2
In-school suspensions 141 4.6% 156 5.07 10.7% 20.2
Out-of-school suspensions 201 6.5% 273 8.88 5.9% 8.3
DAEP placements 68 2.2% 70 2.28 4.4% 5.1
Mandatory DAEP placements 59 1.9% 60 1.95 3.3% 3.8
Discretionary DAEP placements 10 0.3% 10 0.33 2.5% 2.9
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Lamar HS
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,321
Selected comparison
$12,036

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting

−$2,715 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,321 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLamar HSParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,086$14,470$13,054$7,818 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,458 rated schools reporting
2019$6,053$13,643$13,108$8,003 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,477 rated schools reporting
2020$7,002$13,627$14,058$8,490 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,489 rated schools reporting
2021$7,095$13,515$14,797$8,904 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,508 rated schools reporting
2022$8,987$14,985$15,708$10,194 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,520 rated schools reporting
2023$8,096$16,350$16,792$10,634 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,538 rated schools reporting
2024$8,743$18,150$18,125$11,615 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 rated schools reporting
2025$9,321$17,026$18,972$12,036 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,872+$4,874 vs similar economic context
Teachers
151+107.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.4−1.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lamar HS

Beginning: 15.2%1 to 5 years: 33.8%6 to 10 years: 13.3%11 to 20 years: 19.6%21 to 30 years: 13.2%Over 30 years: 4.9%
  • Beginning 15.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 19.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.2%
  • Over 30 years 4.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 reporting for every category shown · 1,611 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.1%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 29.8%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lamar HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLamar HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English25.715.2
Secondary languages other than English24.717.6
Secondary math31.916.2
Secondary science29.617.7
Secondary social studies31.117.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 4of 400

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Similar size · of the 400 that report this measure

  • 8of 136

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 18of 445

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 445 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912008.