Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 585
- Selected comparison
- 617.1
Traditional public school campus
Lamar Elem
Midland County · Region 18: Midland · 585 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 65/1002025-26
- Change
- +6 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −12.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,252 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,967 of 2,252tied with 31 others
- Score vs region
- −12.8 ptsvs 77.8 average · 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland
- Region 18: Midland placement
- 141 of 157tied with 1 other
- Score vs county
- −13.0 ptsvs 78 average · 43 rated schools in Midland County
- Midland County placement
- 40 of 43tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- −15.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,725 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 4,341 of 4,725tied with 43 others
- Score vs state
- −16.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 7,094 of 7,646tied with 64 others
D65
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 59 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.5 average for 2,252 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland.The current score is below the 78 average for 43 rated schools in Midland County.The current score is below the 80.3 average for 4,725 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lamar Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.5 average for 2,252 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,967th of 2,252 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 31 others).
Lamar Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 141st of 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland (tied with 1 other).
Lamar Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78 average for 43 rated schools in Midland County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 40th of 43 rated schools in Midland County (tied with 1 other).
Lamar Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.3 average for 4,725 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4,341st of 4,725 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 43 others).
Lamar Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7,094th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 64 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 59 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | D | 65 | 77.5 2,252 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 74 | 77.1 2,238 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 80 | 74.3 2,221 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | F | 58 | 74.8 2,207 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | F | 59 | 81.7 2,187 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Lamar Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,252 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 56 | F | 4 |
| School Progress | 65 | D | 5 |
| Closing the Gaps | 65 | D | 5 |
| Academic Growth | 65 | D | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 56 | F | 4 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (65), so Student Achievement (56) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 65.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,252 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 585
- Economically disadvantaged
- 82.7%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 41.7%+9.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 9.1%−9.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 91.2%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 33.8%+12.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lamar Elem
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 82.9%
- White 8.2%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.7%
- Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,252 reporting for every category shown · 2,252 in full cohort
- African American 14.3%
- Hispanic 70.5%
- White 10.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
- African American 3.4%
- Hispanic 72.1%
- White 20.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison average For Midland County · 43 reporting for every category shown · 43 in full cohort
- African American 6%
- Hispanic 66%
- White 22.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 2.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,725 reporting for every category shown · 4,725 in full cohort
- African American 12.2%
- Hispanic 54.6%
- White 24.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 585
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 484
- Emergent bilingual students
- 244
- Special education students
- 53
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 132
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 558
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 23.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 585 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 19 (3.1%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 585
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −19
Decrease · −3.1%
- Change since 2021–22
- +152
Increase · +35.1%
| School year | Students enrolledLamar Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 433 | First available year | 648.2 |
| 2022–23 | 497 | Increase of 64 (14.8%) | 649.1 |
| 2023–24 | 397 | Decrease of 100 (20.1%) | 642 |
| 2024–25 | 604 | Increase of 207 (52.1%) | 637.9 |
| 2025–26 | 585 | Decrease of 19 (3.1%) | 617.1 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 85
12.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 166
24.85 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 668
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 12.7%
- Selected comparison
- 13.3%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 24.85
- Selected comparison
- 32.2
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 504 | 36 | 7.1% | 70 | 13.89 | 8.0% | 15.8 |
| 2021–22 | 499 | 66 | 13.2% | 103 | 20.64 | 12.8% | 30.9 |
| 2022–23 | 597 | 63 | 10.6% | 108 | 18.09 | 13.8% | 34.1 |
| 2023–24 | 437 | 27 | 6.2% | 42 | 9.61 | 13.8% | 34.1 |
| 2024–25 | 668 | 85 | 12.7% | 166 | 24.85 | 13.3% | 32.2 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 85 | 12.7% | 166 | 24.85 | 13.3% | 32.2 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 82 | 12.3% | 159 | 23.80 | 8.5% | 13.4 |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Lamar Elem
- Parent district: Midland ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,832
- Selected comparison
- $13,252
For 2025, TEA reported $12,832 per student for this campus, $18,529 per student for its parent district, Midland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Lamar Elem | Parent district: Midland ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,600 | $8,732 | $13,054 | $8,244 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,122 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,898 | $9,076 | $13,108 | $8,339 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,150 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,504 | $10,668 | $14,058 | $8,853 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,163 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,646 | $12,683 | $14,797 | $9,538 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,170 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $10,838 | $12,705 | $15,708 | $11,025 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,187 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $7,595 | $13,012 | $16,792 | $11,514 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $12,983 | $14,999 | $18,125 | $12,493 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $12,832 | $18,529 | $18,972 | $13,252 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,236 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
-
6of 42
Per-student spending
Midland County · of the 42 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 165901111.