Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Kreymer ElemA94vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Kreymer Elem
Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 354 students
Current score
94/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+8.4 ptsvs 85.6 average · 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
84 of 1,221tied with 46 others
Score vs region
+11.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
66 of 1,157tied with 42 others
Score vs county
+7.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
21 of 307tied with 22 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,482 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
179 of 3,482tied with 63 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
The current score is above the 85.6 average for 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 3,482 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
95+16.1 pts vs 78.9
95 is 16.1 points above
the 78.9 average among 1,167 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 3rd of 1,167 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Kreymer Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.6 average for 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 84th of 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 46 others).
Kreymer Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 66th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 42 others).
Kreymer Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 21st of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 22 others).
Kreymer Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 3,482 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 179th of 3,482 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 63 others).
Kreymer Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,190 reporting
School Progress95 A+11.8 vs similar economic context · 1,187 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,177 reporting
Academic Growth95 A+16.1 vs similar economic context · 1,167 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,187 reporting
Kreymer Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,221 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
95
A
—
Relative Performance
85
B
5
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so
Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
Meets grade level66%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
Masters grade level44%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,189 reporting
Meets grade level67%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,189 reporting
Masters grade level48%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,189 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 reporting
Meets grade level65%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 reporting
Masters grade level39%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,221 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
354
Economically disadvantaged
35.9%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.2%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.8%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—
Student demographics
Kreymer Elem
African American 22.5%
Hispanic 23.1%
White 37.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 8.8%
Two or More Races 7.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting for every category shown · 1,221 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 32.7%
White 47.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,482 reporting for every category shown · 3,482 in full cohort
African American 11.2%
Hispanic 54.3%
White 28.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
351
Economically disadvantaged students
126
Emergent bilingual students
50
Special education students
87
TEA context labels
New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
Average salary
$68,436+$672 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−20.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−2.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Kreymer Elem
Beginning 24.7%
1 to 5 years 34.2%
6 to 10 years 13.7%
11 to 20 years 20.5%
21 to 30 years 6.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting for every category shown · 1,221 in full cohort
Beginning 5.1%
1 to 5 years 22.8%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 31.6%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,482 reporting for every category shown · 3,482 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.3%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 75 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 1,167
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,167 that report this measure · tied with 6
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
30of 1,106
School Progress
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 19
151of 3,224
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,224 that report this measure · tied with 16
176of 3,224
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,224 that report this measure · tied with 17
179of 3,482
Overall score
Similar size · of the 3,482 that report this measure · tied with 63
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043914112.