Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Kreymer Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 354 students

Current score
94/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+8.4 ptsvs 85.6 average · 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
84 of 1,221tied with 46 others
A94

At a glance

The current score is above the 85.6 average for 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

95 +16.1 pts vs 78.9

  • 95 is 16.1 points above the 78.9 average among 1,167 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 3rd of 1,167 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 60.8% avg · +5.2 pts
Masters
44%vs 29.1% avg · +14.9 pts

Among 1,190 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
65%vs 54.7% avg · +10.3 pts
Masters
39%vs 24.3% avg · +14.7 pts

Among 1,186 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Kreymer Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.6 average for 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 84th of 1,221 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 46 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 94 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9485.6 1,221 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,190 reporting
  • School Progress95 A+11.8 vs similar economic context · 1,187 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,177 reporting
  • Academic Growth95 A+16.1 vs similar economic context · 1,167 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,187 reporting
  • Kreymer Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,221 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress95A—
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth95A—
Relative Performance85B5

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
  • Masters grade level44%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,189 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,189 reporting
  • Masters grade level48%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,189 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,221 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
354
Economically disadvantaged
35.9%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.2%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.8%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Kreymer Elem

African American: 22.5%Hispanic: 23.1%White: 37.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 8.8%Two or More Races: 7.4%
  • African American 22.5%
  • Hispanic 23.1%
  • White 37.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 8.8%
  • Two or More Races 7.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting for every category shown · 1,221 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 32.7%White: 47.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.8%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.6%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 32.7%
  • White 47.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
351
Economically disadvantaged students
126
Emergent bilingual students
50
Special education students
87

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$68,436+$672 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−20.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−2.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Kreymer Elem

Beginning: 24.7%1 to 5 years: 34.2%6 to 10 years: 13.7%11 to 20 years: 20.5%21 to 30 years: 6.8%
  • Beginning 24.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 34.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 20.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 reporting for every category shown · 1,221 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17.2%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 75 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 1,167

    Academic Growth

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,167 that report this measure · tied with 6

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

4 measures

  • 30of 1,106

    School Progress

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 19

  • 151of 3,224

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 3,224 that report this measure · tied with 16

  • 176of 3,224

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 3,224 that report this measure · tied with 17

  • 179of 3,482

    Overall score

    Similar size · of the 3,482 that report this measure · tied with 63

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043914112.