Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 488 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
99/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+18.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 1,933 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 1,933tied with 6 others
A99

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.8 average for 1,933 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

99 +18.2 pts vs 80.8

  • 99 is 18.2 points above the 80.8 average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

100 +22 pts vs 78

  • 100 is 22 points above the 78 average among 1,826 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 1,826 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 11 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Top placement

Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

100% Tied for 1st of 533 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 5 share this value

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 1,933 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1st of 1,933 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJudge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet 9696999999 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9980.8 1,933 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9980.6 1,909 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9978.6 1,888 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9679.1 1,854 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9682.5 1,829 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement98 A+18.7 vs similar economic context · 1,850 reporting
  • School Progress98 A+16.7 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+22.0 vs similar economic context · 1,826 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C+0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,791 reporting
  • Relative Performance98 A+18.5 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
  • Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,933 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement98A—
School Progress98A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance98A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level100%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
  • Meets grade level95%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Meets grade level100%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Meets grade level99%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Masters grade level82%+60 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 reporting
  • Meets grade level99%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 reporting
  • Masters grade level74%+52 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,933 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+6.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 493 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 489 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 489 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 496 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.2 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%87.8%+12.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course100.0%59.2%+40.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA100.0%28.3%+71.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)88.9%10.4%+78.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course32.5%33.9%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%37.5%−37.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.1%−6.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.1%−3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.8%7.8%−7.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.8%3.4%−2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
111

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
61

55.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
36

32.4% of graduates

Not trackable
14

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
111
Selected comparison
226.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
61
Selected comparison
99.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
55.0%
Selected comparison
44.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

+10.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
32.4%
Selected comparison
50.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

−18.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
12.6%
Selected comparison
4.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

+7.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. U. OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON (003656)15
  2. DALLAS COLLEGE DISTRICT (009331)12
  3. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)9

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
488
Economically disadvantaged
59.8%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.6%−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.5%−16.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.9%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet

African American: 13.9%Hispanic: 73.8%White: 7.2%Asian: 3.3%Two or More Races: 1.8%
  • African American 13.9%
  • Hispanic 73.8%
  • White 7.2%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Two or More Races 1.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting for every category shown · 1,933 in full cohort

African American: 10.3%Hispanic: 47.9%White: 35%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.3%
  • Hispanic 47.9%
  • White 35%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
488
Economically disadvantaged students
292
Emergent bilingual students
47
Special education students
12

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
9
Students in TEA mobility denominator
497
TEA-published mobility rate
1.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 488 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 6 (1.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
488

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−6

Decrease · −1.2%

Change since 2021–22
+20

Increase · +4.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
488
Selected comparison
632.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet
School yearStudents enrolledJudge Barefoot Sanders Law MagnetChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 468 First available year 638.8
2022–23 478 Increase of 10 (2.1%) 643.3
2023–24 480 Increase of 2 (0.4%) 642.5
2024–25 494 Increase of 14 (2.9%) 639.8
2025–26 488 Decrease of 6 (1.2%) 632.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
495

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 452 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 464 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 477 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 480 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 495 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet
  • Parent district: Dallas ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,073
Selected comparison
$12,465

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting

−$5,392 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,073 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJudge Barefoot Sanders Law MagnetParent district: Dallas ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,361$13,363$13,054$7,927 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,762 rated schools reporting
2019$6,123$13,990$13,108$8,074 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,781 rated schools reporting
2020$6,810$14,981$14,058$8,687 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,799 rated schools reporting
2021$7,380$17,075$14,797$9,099 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 rated schools reporting
2022$7,114$18,716$15,708$10,428 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 rated schools reporting
2023$7,428$20,932$16,792$11,100 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,854 rated schools reporting
2024$7,341$22,990$18,125$11,913 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2025$7,073$23,271$18,972$12,465 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$81,420+$14,923 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−15.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.3−0.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet

Beginning: 4.1%1 to 5 years: 16.1%6 to 10 years: 20.6%11 to 20 years: 42.3%21 to 30 years: 16.1%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 4.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 16.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 42.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.1%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting for every category shown · 1,933 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.4%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJudge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English1414.9
Secondary math25.415.6
Secondary social studies24.117

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

7 measures

  • 1of 7,260

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 24

  • 1of 7,254

    Reading — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 32

  • 1of 7,254

    Reading — Meets

    Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

  • 1of 4,043

    Science — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,043 that report this measure · tied with 61

  • 1of 1,933

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,933 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 1of 1,606

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Texas average · of the 1,606 that report this measure · tied with 12

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 1,850

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,850 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 2of 1,843

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,843 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 2of 1,843

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,843 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 2of 934

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 934 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 1,694

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,694 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 1,694

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,694 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 1,850

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,850 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 934

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 934 that report this measure

  • 4of 533

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 533 that report this measure

  • 7of 1,106

    Math — Approaches

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 10of 1,850

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,850 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 29of 1,839

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,839 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 50of 1,847

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,847 that report this measure · tied with 4

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905038.