Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

John Neely Bryan Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 463 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,532 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
364 of 1,532tied with 57 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,532 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

83 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 8.3 points above the 77.7 average among 1,532 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 11 points

65 to 76 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 76 is 6 points above the 70 average among 1,423 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 40.3% avg · +9.7 pts
Masters
22%vs 16% avg · +6 pts

Among 1,423 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

John Neely Bryan Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,532 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 364th of 1,532 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 57 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJohn Neely Bryan Elem 8669628386 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8677.7 1,532 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8377.4 1,515 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6273.8 1,500 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6973.1 1,497 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8681.9 1,482 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement76 C+6.0 vs similar economic context · 1,423 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,420 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,411 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+12.5 vs similar economic context · 1,400 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,419 reporting
  • John Neely Bryan Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,532 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement76C4
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,532 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
463
Economically disadvantaged
97.4%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
46.0%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.4%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.5%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
21.5%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

John Neely Bryan Elem

African American: 38.9%Hispanic: 59%White: 0.9%American Indian: 0.4%Two or More Races: 0.9%
  • African American 38.9%
  • Hispanic 59%
  • White 0.9%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 0.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,532 reporting for every category shown · 1,532 in full cohort

African American: 15.1%Hispanic: 77.6%White: 4.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 15.1%
  • Hispanic 77.6%
  • White 4.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
463
Economically disadvantaged students
451
Emergent bilingual students
213
Special education students
53

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
99
Students in TEA mobility denominator
413
TEA-published mobility rate
24%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 463 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (2.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
463

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+9

Increase · +2.0%

Change since 2021–22
+87

Increase · +23.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
463
Selected comparison
550

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,514 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for John Neely Bryan Elem
School yearStudents enrolledJohn Neely Bryan ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 376 First available year 600.4
2022–23 379 Increase of 3 (0.8%) 596
2023–24 435 Increase of 56 (14.8%) 585.8
2024–25 454 Increase of 19 (4.4%) 577.7
2025–26 463 Increase of 9 (2.0%) 550

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
497

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for John Neely Bryan Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 390 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 423 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 431 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 501 14 2.8% 16 3.19 13.8% 32.9
2024–25 497 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for John Neely Bryan Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$16k$24k20182020202220242025
  • John Neely Bryan Elem
  • Parent district: Dallas ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,077
Selected comparison
$13,537

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,514 rated schools reporting

−$1,460 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,077 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJohn Neely Bryan ElemParent district: Dallas ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,161$13,363$13,054$8,393 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,448 rated schools reporting
2019$8,878$13,990$13,108$8,369 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,464 rated schools reporting
2020$9,358$14,981$14,058$8,881 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 rated schools reporting
2021$12,022$17,075$14,797$9,768 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 rated schools reporting
2022$12,050$18,716$15,708$11,248 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,483 rated schools reporting
2023$13,896$20,932$16,792$11,779 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,497 rated schools reporting
2024$12,417$22,990$18,125$12,883 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 rated schools reporting
2025$12,077$23,271$18,972$13,537 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,514 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$75,118+$6,420 vs similar economic context
Teachers
35−3.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.2−1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

John Neely Bryan Elem

Beginning: 2.9%1 to 5 years: 37.1%6 to 10 years: 11.4%11 to 20 years: 40%21 to 30 years: 8.6%
  • Beginning 2.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 37.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 11.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 40%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,532 reporting for every category shown · 1,532 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for John Neely Bryan Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJohn Neely Bryan Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.118.1
Grade 11818.3
Grade 221.618.2
Grade 315.918.3
Grade 414.618.2
Grade 524.318.9
Grade 614.217.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905114.