Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Jim Cullen Elem

Hays County · Region 13: Austin · 498 students

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
+1.7 ptsvs 90.3 average · 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
252 of 706tied with 77 others
A92

At a glance

The available rating history is flat. The current score is above the 90.3 average for 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

92 +4.2 pts vs 87.8

  • 92 is 4.2 points above the 87.8 average among 690 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

91 +4.5 pts vs 86.5

  • 91 is 4.5 points above the 86.5 average among 692 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

91 +6.5 pts vs 84.5

  • 91 is 6.5 points above the 84.5 average among 688 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Jim Cullen Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.3 average for 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2024-25.

Ranks 252nd of 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJim Cullen Elem 9292 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9290.3 706 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9290.5 700 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+0.8 vs similar economic context · 694 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 692 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+4.2 vs similar economic context · 690 reporting
  • Academic Growth91 A+6.5 vs similar economic context · 688 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C±0.0 vs similar economic context · 692 reporting
  • Jim Cullen Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (706 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth91A—
Relative Performance79C1

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 652 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 652 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 652 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (706 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
498
Economically disadvantaged
17.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.1%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.2%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.4%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Jim Cullen Elem

African American: 4.6%Hispanic: 41.2%White: 42%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 7.9%Two or More Races: 3.6%
  • African American 4.6%
  • Hispanic 41.2%
  • White 42%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 7.9%
  • Two or More Races 3.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 706 reporting for every category shown · 706 in full cohort

African American: 7%Hispanic: 22.2%White: 48.4%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 16.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.5%
  • African American 7%
  • Hispanic 22.2%
  • White 48.4%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 16.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
495
Economically disadvantaged students
84
Emergent bilingual students
60
Special education students
95

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
28
Students in TEA mobility denominator
298
TEA-published mobility rate
9.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 498 students in 2025–26, an increase of 102 (25.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
498

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+102

Increase · +25.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
498
Selected comparison
860.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Jim Cullen Elem
School yearStudents enrolledJim Cullen ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 396 First available year 869.6
2025–26 498 Increase of 102 (25.8%) 860.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
423

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Jim Cullen Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 423 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Jim Cullen Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$10k$17k$25k2025
  • Jim Cullen Elem
  • Parent district: Hays CISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$23,713
Selected comparison
$11,018

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 700 rated schools reporting

+$12,695 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $23,713 per student for this campus, $22,838 per student for its parent district, Hays CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJim Cullen ElemParent district: Hays CISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$23,713$22,838$18,972$11,018 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 700 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,344−$807 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−22.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.3+0.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Jim Cullen Elem

1 to 5 years: 27.9%6 to 10 years: 35%11 to 20 years: 24.8%21 to 30 years: 12.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 35%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 706 reporting for every category shown · 706 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 23%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 32.6%21 to 30 years: 17.1%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Jim Cullen Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJim Cullen Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1818.8
Grade 114.819.1
Grade 215.219.7
Grade 313.521.4
Grade 413.720.4
Grade 513.622.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 52

    Overall score

    Hays County · of the 52 that report this measure

  • 1of 49

    Academic Growth

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 2

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

4 measures

  • 2of 49

    Closing the Gaps

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 49

    Math — Meets

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure

  • 3of 49

    Math — Approaches

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 49

    Math — Masters

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

8 measures

  • 4of 49

    Attendance

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure

  • 5of 50

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 50

    All Subjects — Meets

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure

  • 5of 50

    All Subjects — Masters

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 50

    Per-student spending

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure

  • 9of 49

    Science — Meets

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure

  • 9of 49

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure

  • 10of 50

    Reading — Meets

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 105906120.