+6.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
539 of 2,001tied with 83 others
Score vs region
+2.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
543 of 1,303tied with 57 others
Score vs county
+2.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
371 of 911tied with 43 others
Score vs similar-size group
−1.0 ptsvs 87 average · 333 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
191 of 333tied with 21 others
Score vs state
+4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.8 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is below the 87 average for 333 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 47.7% avg · +15.3 pts
Masters
24%vs 19.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Among 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Jersey Village HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 539th of 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 83 others).
Jersey Village HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 543rd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 57 others).
Jersey Village HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 371st of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 43 others).
Jersey Village HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 87 average for 333 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 191st of 333 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 21 others).
Jersey Village HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement78 C+0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
School Progress84 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+14.0 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,827 reporting
Relative Performance84 B+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Jersey Village HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
78
C
2
School Progress
84
B
6
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
84
B
6
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (84), so
Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 84.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level84%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level63%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level24%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Meets grade level59%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Masters grade level13%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Meets grade level49%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Meets grade level69%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Masters grade level37%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Meets grade level76%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Masters grade level46%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
91.9%−1.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 450 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
94.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
94.6%+2.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.7%±0.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 453 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
70.0%−17.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
70.0%
87.9%
−17.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
42.6%
59.7%
−17.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
29.5%
27.7%
+1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
19.3%
10.9%
+8.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
30.8%
33.7%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
30.4%
37.9%
−7.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.8%
−1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
10.0%
7.1%
+2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
3.7%
−3.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
4.3%
3.3%
+1.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
3.0%
8.0%
−5.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
3.0%
3.2%
−0.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
746
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
296
39.7% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
345
46.2% of graduates
Not trackable
105
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
746
Selected comparison
238.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
296
Selected comparison
104.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
39.7%
Selected comparison
43.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
46.2%
Selected comparison
50.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
14.1%
Selected comparison
5.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
+8.7 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)53
LONE STAR COLLEGE - CY-FAIR (000717)49
LONE STAR COLLEGE - HOUSTON NO (000819)30
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
3,188
Economically disadvantaged
65.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.5%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.1%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.2%−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
25.8%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Jersey Village HS
African American 10.6%
Hispanic 64.7%
White 10.7%
American Indian 1%
Asian 10.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
African American 11.4%
Hispanic 52.3%
White 29.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 333 reporting for every category shown · 333 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 51.1%
White 23.8%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 7.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
3,186
Economically disadvantaged students
2,088
Emergent bilingual students
622
Special education students
323
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
342
Students in TEA mobility denominator
3,485
TEA-published mobility rate
9.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 3,188 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 135 (4.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
3,188
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−135
Decrease · −4.1%
Change since 2021–22
−148
Decrease · −4.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
3,188
Selected comparison
624.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Jersey Village HS
School year
Students enrolledJersey Village HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
3,336
First available year
641.9
2022–23
3,364
Increase of 28 (0.8%)
647.8
2023–24
3,365
Increase of 1 (less than 0.1%)
644.1
2024–25
3,323
Decrease of 42 (1.2%)
639.7
2025–26
3,188
Decrease of 135 (4.1%)
624.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
1,094
31.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
4,595
132.77 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
3,461
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
31.6%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 rated schools reporting
+18.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
132.77
Selected comparison
30.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,651 rated schools reporting
+102.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Jersey Village HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
3,443
359
10.4%
894
25.97
9.8%
19.5
2021–22
3,484
859
24.7%
2,977
85.45
12.9%
30.3
2022–23
3,475
932
26.8%
3,617
104.09
13.4%
32.1
2023–24
3,501
934
26.7%
3,703
105.77
13.2%
31.8
2024–25
3,461
1,094
31.6%
4,595
132.77
12.9%
30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Jersey Village HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
1,094
31.6%
4,595
132.77
12.9%
30.3
In-school suspensions
1,003
29.0%
3,274
94.60
11.5%
23
Out-of-school suspensions
433
12.5%
1,117
32.27
7.2%
10.7
DAEP placements
171
4.9%
203
5.87
5.0%
6
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Jersey Village HS
Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,771
Selected comparison
$12,728
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
−$4,957 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,771 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Jersey Village HS
Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,444
$12,265
$13,054
$7,951
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,727
$12,730
$13,108
$8,116
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,883
$12,750
$14,058
$8,695
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,980
$14,470
$14,797
$9,164
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,468
$15,507
$15,708
$10,497
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,558
$15,990
$16,792
$11,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,860
$16,047
$18,125
$12,094
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,771
$16,633
$18,972
$12,728
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$74,245+$7,837 vs similar economic context
Teachers
218+174.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.6+0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Jersey Village HS
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 28.6%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.8%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 333 reporting for every category shown · 333 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 30.2%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Jersey Village HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classJersey Village HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
20.2
15
Secondary languages other than English
20.9
17.6
Secondary math
21.1
15.9
Secondary science
21.8
17.3
Secondary social studies
23.4
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907003.