+2.5 ptsvs 91.5 average · 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
96 of 513tied with 63 others
Score vs region
+10.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
86 of 1,303tied with 44 others
Score vs county
+10.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
64 of 911tied with 33 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.0 ptsvs 81 average · 3,362 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
113 of 3,362tied with 84 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.5 average for 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 81 average for 3,362 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 75.9% avg · +4.1 pts
Masters
53%vs 46.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Among 504 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
James E Randolph Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.5 average for 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 96th of 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).
James E Randolph Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 86th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 44 others).
James E Randolph Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 64th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 33 others).
James E Randolph Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 3,362 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 113th of 3,362 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 84 others).
James E Randolph Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+1.4 vs similar economic context · 504 reporting
School Progress88 B+0.3 vs similar economic context · 502 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+5.0 vs similar economic context · 499 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+1.8 vs similar economic context · 499 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 502 reporting
James E Randolph Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (513 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
83
B
7
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level95%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Meets grade level80%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Masters grade level53%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Meets grade level85%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Masters grade level62%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Meets grade level81%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Masters grade level49%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Meets grade level68%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Masters grade level38%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (513 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
864
Economically disadvantaged
8.3%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.3%+8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.1%+7.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.3%−3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
James E Randolph Elem
African American 2.7%
Hispanic 17.4%
White 48.7%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 25%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 reporting for every category shown · 513 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 18%
White 48.7%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 22%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,362 reporting for every category shown · 3,362 in full cohort
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 52.7%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
864
Economically disadvantaged students
72
Emergent bilingual students
167
Special education students
200
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
868
TEA-published mobility rate
5.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 864 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 131 (13.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
864
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−131
Decrease · −13.2%
Change since 2021–22
−225
Decrease · −20.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
864
Selected comparison
864.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 507 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for James E Randolph Elem
School year
Students enrolledJames E Randolph Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,089
First available year
873.2
2022–23
1,078
Decrease of 11 (1.0%)
893.4
2023–24
1,032
Decrease of 46 (4.3%)
883.7
2024–25
995
Decrease of 37 (3.6%)
874.9
2025–26
864
Decrease of 131 (13.2%)
864.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27
2.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
61
5.99 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,018
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.6%
Selected comparison
4.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 rated schools reporting
−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
5.99
Selected comparison
8.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 345 rated schools reporting
−2.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for James E Randolph Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,123
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
1,136
12
1.1%
16
1.41
4.7%
8
2022–23
1,096
13
1.2%
19
1.73
4.9%
8.1
2023–24
1,063
18
1.7%
30
2.82
4.8%
8.1
2024–25
1,018
27
2.6%
61
5.99
4.8%
8.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for James E Randolph Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
27
2.6%
61
5.99
4.8%
8.1
In-school suspensions
27
2.6%
59
5.80
4.5%
6.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
James E Randolph Elem
Parent district: Katy ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,045
Selected comparison
$10,812
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 501 rated schools reporting
−$1,767 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,045 per student for this campus, $17,981 per student for its parent district, Katy ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
James E Randolph Elem
Parent district: Katy ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,367
$14,611
$13,054
$7,227
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,948
$14,868
$13,108
$7,309
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 437 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,060
$15,576
$14,058
$7,615
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,793
$13,959
$14,797
$8,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,213
$15,755
$15,708
$9,469
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,279
$17,477
$16,792
$9,534
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,218
$16,789
$18,125
$10,466
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,045
$17,981
$18,972
$10,812
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 501 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$74,123+$4,764 vs similar economic context
Teachers
62+6.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.9−0.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
James E Randolph Elem
Beginning 1.6%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 16.1%
11 to 20 years 35.4%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 reporting for every category shown · 513 in full cohort
Beginning 4.3%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 31.8%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,362 reporting for every category shown · 3,362 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for James E Randolph Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classJames E Randolph Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.3
19
Grade 1
28.6
19.2
Grade 2
29.8
19.7
Grade 3
29.5
21.6
Grade 4
28.1
20.4
Grade 5
31.6
22.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
11 measures
29of 874
Reading — Approaches
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 13
33of 870
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Harris County · of the 870 that report this measure · tied with 4
36of 874
All Subjects — Approaches
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 15
37of 874
Reading — Masters
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure
47of 873
Math — Meets
Harris County · of the 873 that report this measure · tied with 4
62of 1,239
Math — Approaches
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,239 that report this measure · tied with 16
66of 1,242
Reading — Meets
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,242 that report this measure · tied with 13
66of 1,239
Math — Masters
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,239 that report this measure · tied with 6
90of 3,301
Closing the Gaps
Similar size · of the 3,301 that report this measure · tied with 62
141of 3,301
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 3,301 that report this measure · tied with 19
146of 3,301
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,301 that report this measure · tied with 9
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101914139.